Literature DB >> 25329455

Mini-fluid challenge predicts fluid responsiveness during spontaneous breathing under spinal anaesthesia: An observational study.

Pierre-Grégoire Guinot1, Eugenie Bernard, Fanny Defrancq, Sandra Petiot, Yazine Majoub, Herve Dupont, Emmanuel Lorne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients under spinal anaesthesia is desirable.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test whether variations in stroke volume (SV) in response to a fixed mini-fluid challenge (ΔSV100) measured by thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) can predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients under spinal anaesthesia.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study.
SETTING: Anaesthesiology department in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-three patients monitored by ICG during surgery under spinal anaesthesia.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a 100 ml fluid challenge followed by volume expansion with 500 ml of crystalloid. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Haemodynamic variables and bioimpedance indices [blood pressure, SV, cardiac output (CO)] were measured before and after fluid challenge and before and after volume expansion. Responders were defined as those with >15% increase in SV after volume expansion.
RESULTS: SV increased by at least 15% in 27 (37%) of the 73 patients. ΔSV100 predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve of 0.93 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.8 to 0.97, P < 0.001]. The cut-off was 7% and a grey zone ranging between 3 and 8% was observed in up to 14% of patients. SV baseline was a poor predictor of fluid responsiveness [AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.79, P = 0.002)].
CONCLUSION: ΔSV100 greater than 7% accurately predicted fluid responsiveness during surgery with a grey zone ranging between 3 and 8%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25329455     DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Using extra systoles and the micro-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Simon T Vistisen; Jonas M Berg; Mattheus F Boekel; Marco Modestini; Remco Bergman; Jayant S Jainandunsing; Massimo A Mariani; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) before, during and after Sustained Low Efficiency Dialysis (SLED). A Prospective Study on Feasibility of TPTD and Prediction of Successful Fluid Removal.

Authors:  Wolfgang Huber; Stephan Fuchs; Andreas Minning; Claudius Küchle; Marlena Braun; Analena Beitz; Caroline Schultheiss; Sebastian Mair; Veit Phillip; Sebastian Schmid; Roland M Schmid; Tobias Lahmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Toscani; Hollmann D Aya; Dimitra Antonakaki; Davide Bastoni; Ximena Watson; Nish Arulkumaran; Andrew Rhodes; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Accuracy of Passive Leg Raising Test in Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Children.

Authors:  Ahmed A El-Nawawy; Passant M Farghaly; Hadir M Hassouna
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-05

5.  Implications of Continuous Noninvasive Finger Cuff Arterial Pressure Device Use during Cesarean Delivery for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Preload Optimization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shan-Han Yang; Yi-Shiuan Lin; Chien-Nan Lee; Ya-Jung Cheng; Ying-Hsi Chen; Hsin-Chan Chiu; Chun-Yu Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation-an experts' opinion paper.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Fellahi; Emmanuel Futier; Camille Vaisse; Olivier Collange; Olivier Huet; Jerôme Loriau; Etienne Gayat; Benoit Tavernier; Matthieu Biais; Karim Asehnoune; Bernard Cholley; Dan Longrois
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy guided by non-invasive monitoring on perioperative complications in elderly hip fracture patients within an enhanced recovery pathway.

Authors:  Juan V Lorente; Francesca Reguant; Anna Arnau; Marcelo Borderas; Juan C Prieto; Jordi Torrallardona; Laura Carrasco; Patricia Solano; Isabel Pérez; Carla Farré; Ignacio Jiménez; Javier Ripollés-Melchor; Manuel I Monge; Joan Bosch
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-10

8.  Mini-fluid challenge test predicts stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness during spine surgery in prone position: A STARD-compliant diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Chen-Tse Lee; Tzong-Shiun Lee; Ching-Tang Chiu; Hsiao-Chun Teng; Hsiao-Liang Cheng; Chun-Yu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.