| Literature DB >> 25328527 |
Alice Charwudzi1, Edeghonghon E Olayemi2, Ivy Ekem2, Olufunmilayo Olopade3, Mariann Coyle3, Amma Anima Benneh4, Emmanuel Alote Allotey5.
Abstract
Background. FISH is a molecular cytogenetic technique enabling rapid detection of genetic abnormalities. Facilities that can run fresh/wet samples for molecular diagnosis and monitoring of neoplastic disorders are not readily available in Ghana and other neighbouring countries. This study aims to demonstrate that interphase FISH can successfully be applied to archival methanol-fixed bone marrow and peripheral blood smear slides transported to a more equipped facility for molecular diagnosis of CML. Methods. Interphase FISH was performed on 22 archival methanol-fixed marrow (BM) and 3 peripheral blood (PB) smear slides obtained at diagnosis. The BM smears included 20 CML and 2 CMML cases diagnosed by morphology; the 3 PB smears were from 3 of the CML patients at the time of diagnosis. Six cases had known BCR-ABL fusion results at diagnosis by RQ-PCR. Full blood count reports at diagnosis were also retrieved. Result. 19 (95%) of the CML marrow smears demonstrated the BCR-ABL translocation. There was a significant correlation between the BCR-ABL transcript detected at diagnosis by RQ-PCR and that retrospectively detected by FISH from the aged BM smears at diagnosis (r = 0.870; P = 0.035). Conclusion. Archival methanol-fixed marrow and peripheral blood smears can be used to detect the BCR-ABL transcript for CML diagnosis.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25328527 PMCID: PMC4190273 DOI: 10.1155/2014/604165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Hematol
Pretreatment full blood count profile of study population.
| Parameter | Study subject, | Ranges |
|---|---|---|
| Median | ||
| Leucocyte count (×109/L) | 253.1 | 20.7–636.8 |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 446.2 | 46.0–1051.0 |
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 8.2 | 5.2–11.5 |
| Neutrophils (%)∗∗ | 67.6 | 45.7–89.3 |
| Eosinophils (%)∗∗ | 2.2 | 0.1–12.3 |
| Basophils (%)∗∗ | 4.5 | 0.0–25.0 |
Table 1 shows the full blood count profile of the 20 subjects at diagnosis. NB: % = percentage. ∗∗Absolute values for the differential counts were not available for majority of subjects at diagnosis; hence, percentage differential count was used.
Figure 1BCR-ABL dual colour, dual fusion translocation probe hybridized to controls, and subject's bone marrow and peripheral blood smears. ((a1) and (b1)) Two red, two green (2R2G), negative control in a metaphase cell and an interphase cell, respectively; ((a2) and (b2)) five fusion, one green (5F1G), positive control in a metaphase and an interphase cell, respectively. (c) BCR-ABL negative FISH signal in a subject's peripheral blood smears. (d) 2F1R1G signals in a BCR-ABL positive subject BM smear. (e) 1F2R1G signals in a BCR-ABL positive subject marrow smear. (f) 2F1R in a BCR-ABL positive subject's peripheral blood (red cells lysed in glacial acetic acid: methanol fixative). Negative control is from a single BCR-ABL negative peripheral blood donor, and BV 173 is from a BCR-ABL positive cell line in blastic phase. Images were taken with ×100 oil immersion objective lens.