Literature DB >> 19797518

Chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective comparison of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis for the definition of complete cytogenetic response: a study of the GIMEMA CML WP.

Nicoletta Testoni1, Giulia Marzocchi, Simona Luatti, Marilina Amabile, Carmen Baldazzi, Monica Stacchini, Mauro Nanni, Giovanna Rege-Cambrin, Emilia Giugliano, Ursula Giussani, Elisabetta Abruzzese, Simonetta Kerim, Maria Grazia Grimoldi, Alessandro Gozzetti, Barbara Crescenzi, Carlo Carcassi, Paolo Bernasconi, Antonio Cuneo, Francesco Albano, Giuseppina Fugazza, Alfonso Zaccaria, Giovanni Martinelli, Fabrizio Pane, Gianantonio Rosti, Michele Baccarani.   

Abstract

In chronic myeloid leukemia, different methods are available to monitor the response to therapy: chromosome banding analysis (CBA), interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH), and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-Q-PCR). The GIMEMA CML WP (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Adulto Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Working Party) has performed a prospective study to compare CBA and I-FISH for the definition of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR). Samples (n = 664) were evaluated simultaneously by CBA and I-FISH. Of 537 cases in CCgR, the number of positive nuclei by I-FISH was less than 1% in 444 cases (82.7%). Of 451 cases with less than 1% positive nuclei by I-FISH, 444 (98.4%) were classified as CCgR by CBA. The major molecular response rate was significantly greater in cases with I-FISH less than 1% than in those with I-FISH 1% to 5% (66.8% vs 51.6%, P < .001) and in cases with CCgR and I-FISH less than 1% than in cases with CCgR and I-FISH 1% to 5% (66.1% vs 49.4%, P = .004). I-FISH is more sensitive than CBA and can be used to monitor CCgR. With appropriate probes, the cutoff value of I-FISH may be established at 1%. These trials are registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00514488 and NCT00510926.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19797518     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-229864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  18 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Monitoring of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Patients on Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Richa Chauhan; Sudha Sazawal; H P Pati
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Considerations in the management of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2015.

Authors:  Philip A Thompson; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Interpretation of cytogenetic and molecular results in patients treated for CML.

Authors:  Carlos E Vigil; Elizabeth A Griffiths; Eunice S Wang; Meir Wetzler
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 8.250

5.  Early intervention during imatinib therapy in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a study of the Spanish PETHEMA group.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes; Pilar López-Garrido; María-Isabel Montero; Fermín Jonte; Jesús Martínez; Juan-Carlos Hernández-Boluda; María Calbacho; Anna Sureda; Gloria Pérez-Rus; José B Nieto; Cristina Pérez-López; José Román-Gómez; Marcos González; Arturo Pereira; Dolors Colomer
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Cytogenetic follow-up by karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization: implications for monitoring patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and deletion 5q treated with lenalidomide.

Authors:  Gudrun Göhring; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Guntram Büsche; Winfried Hofmann; Hans Heinrich Kreipe; Pierre Fenaux; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Brigitte Schlegelberger
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  Early cytogenetic and molecular response during first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: long-term implications.

Authors:  Alfonso Quintás-Cardama; Jorgé E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What Is the Best Strategy to Start and Monitor Treatment Outside Academic Centers?

Authors:  Carolina Pavlovsky; Maria Jose Mela Osorio
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Modern therapies, current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Afaf E G Osman; Michael W Deininger
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 10.626

Review 10.  European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013.

Authors:  Michele Baccarani; Michael W Deininger; Gianantonio Rosti; Andreas Hochhaus; Simona Soverini; Jane F Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Richard E Clark; Jorge E Cortes; François Guilhot; Henrik Hjorth-Hansen; Timothy P Hughes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dong-Wook Kim; Richard A Larson; Jeffrey H Lipton; François-Xavier Mahon; Giovanni Martinelli; Jiri Mayer; Martin C Müller; Dietger Niederwieser; Fabrizio Pane; Jerald P Radich; Philippe Rousselot; Giuseppe Saglio; Susanne Saußele; Charles Schiffer; Richard Silver; Bengt Simonsson; Juan-Luis Steegmann; John M Goldman; Rüdiger Hehlmann
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.