Literature DB >> 19444059

The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up.

Seung-Jae Hyun1, Seung-Chul Rhim, Sung-Woo Roh, Suk-Hyung Kang, K Daniel Riew.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the time-dependent change in range of motion (ROM) after cervical laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although numerous studies have reported on the loss of flexion/extension ROM associated with laminoplasty, few have reported on the time course of this loss of motion.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients who received unilateral open-door laminoplasties, including miniplate fixation over 2 levels, were serially evaluated at regular set intervals after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 26.78 months (range: 24-41 months). Twelve patients had OPLL and 11 patients had cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups (ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament [OPLL] and cervical spondylotic myelopathy) to compare the ROM between the OPLL and the spondylosis patients. We evaluated the time-dependent neck ROM changes by taking neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Postoperative neck and arm pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale.
RESULTS: The preoperative, and 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month postoperative ROM figures were 37.8 degrees +/- 14.6 degrees, 34.1 degrees +/- 12.9 degrees, 35.0 degrees +/- 12.3 degrees, 30.3 degrees +/- 13.0 degrees, 28.6 degrees +/- 15.1 degrees, 27.3 degrees +/- 12.4 degrees, 26.1 degrees +/- 14.8 degrees, and 25.9 degrees +/- 13.2 degrees, respectively, and at the most recent follow-up, ROM was 25.8 +/- 15.2 degrees. Thus, the mean ROM decreased by 10.1 degrees +/- 9.5 degrees (31.66%) after surgery (P = 0.002). In OPLL group, we observed a more limited cervical ROM than in cervical spondylotic myelopathy group (35.3% vs. 29.2%). However, the rate of ROM reduction slowed with time in both groups (P = 0.000). Postoperative axial pain did not correlate with the degree of serial cervical ROM.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the loss of cervical ROM is time-dependent and plateaus by 18 months after surgery, with no further decreases thereafter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19444059     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c389b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  The effect of multi-level laminoplasty and laminectomy on the biomechanics of the cervical spine: a finite element study.

Authors:  Swathi Kode; Nicole A Kallemeyn; Joseph D Smucker; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicole M Grosland
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

2.  Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Lin-Nan Wang; Lei Wang; Yue-Ming Song; Xi Yang; Li-Min Liu; Tao Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Axial pain after posterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shan-Jin Wang; Sheng-Dan Jiang; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Laminoplasty with selective fusion at unstable segment versus laminectomy with fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Lin Du; Yanzheng Gao; Changqing Zhao; Tangjun Zhou; Haijun Tian; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a review of literature.

Authors:  Byung-Wan Choi; Kyung-Jin Song; Han Chang
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-11-28

6.  Outcomes of secondary laminoplasty for patients with unsatisfactory results after anterior multilevel cervical surgery.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Liu; Liang Chen; Nan-Wei Xu; Hui-Lin Yang; Yong Gu
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-01-31

7.  Open-door cervical laminoplasty with preservation of posterior structures.

Authors:  Kalil G Abdullah; Takayuki Yamashita; Michael P Steinmetz; Daniel Lubelski; Jeffrey C Wang; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-03

8.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty secured with titanium miniplates is a good surgical method for multiple-level cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Ing-Ho Chen; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Ru-Ping Lee; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  Cervical Laminoplasty: The History and the Future.

Authors:  Ryu Kurokawa; Phyo Kim
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Long-term impacts of different posterior operations on curvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy.

Authors:  Wei Du; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen; Yingze Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Longxi Ren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.