| Literature DB >> 25326815 |
Metin Küçükkaya1, Özgür Karakoyun, Sami Sökücü, Ramazan Soydan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study reports our results with retrograde Fitbone insertion in patients with femoral shortening and deformity. We also present our experience regarding the benefits, complications, and factors associated with complications of the Fitbone technique.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25326815 PMCID: PMC4302230 DOI: 10.1007/s00776-014-0659-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Sci ISSN: 0949-2658 Impact factor: 1.601
Fig. 1A 14-year-old male with 14 cm of femoral shortening, 6° varus, and 30° rotational deformity was treated with two consecutive retrograde Fitbone applications. a) Preoperative LSR while the leg length differences were compensated for using plates and the patellae were oriented anteriorly. b) The standard entry point of the K-wire for retrograde femoral nailing and medullary canal reaming was used with rigid reamers. The K-wire should be placed exactly as in the preoperative plan for accurate deformity correction. c) A 30° acute rotational correction was completed before reaming the proximal medullary canal. d) Position of the blocking screw and intraoperative alignment control using a grid plate (see the text). e) Distraction using activation of the transmitter head and the control electronics. f) The x-rays in the early postoperative period and 6 months after 8 cm of distraction. g) The Fitbone was replaced with a new one after the first distraction period, and the femur was distracted a further 6 cm. A temporary external fixator was used intraoperatively to protect the distraction site. h) LSR after 14 cm of lengthening and deformity correction
Fig. 2Close positioning of the proximal locking screw weakens the anterior cortical femur, which might increase the risk of fracture