Literature DB >> 19110806

The TandemHeart, percutaneous transseptal left ventricular assist device: a safeguard in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. The six-year Rotterdam experience.

Pascal Vranckx1, Emanuele Meliga, Peter P T De Jaegere, Martin Van den Ent, Evelyn S Regar, Patrick W Serruys.   

Abstract

AIMS: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in high-risk cardiac patients are preferentially referred to specialised myocardial intervention centres (MIC). Included in this group are patients with a haemodynamic collapse or high likelihood of haemodynamic collapse, either during balloon inflation or with acute vessel closure. The TandemHeart, a percutaneous transseptal left ventricular assist (PTVA) that can be introduced using standard catheterisation laboratory techniques, offers interesting perspectives to reduce procedural risks. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between September 2000 to July 2006, The TandemHeart, supported the circulation of 23 patients (age: range 46-74, mean 59) admitted to our centre for high risk, either emergency or elective, PCI. Successful implantation was achieved in 100% of patients. The mean time for implementation of circulatory support was 35 minutes (range 16-62). The index PCI was successful in all patients except two. A pump flow up to 4L/min was achieved with significant reduction of left ventricular filling pressures, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and with significant increase of systemic arterial pressures. Duration of support ranged from 1-222 hours (mean 31+/-49.8 hours). Five patients died with the TandemHeart in place, four of whom were in irreversible cardiogenic shock at admission. Mild to moderate access site bleeding was seen in 27% of patients. One patient experienced a loge syndrome of the leg. Core temperature (Ct) decreased to <36.5 degrees C in six patients, profound hypothermia (Ct <35 degrees C) was observed in two patients. There was no technical device failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The TandemHeart - PTVA provides effective, total left ventricular support in very high risk PCI settings. The rate of device related cardiac and vascular complications was acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19110806     DOI: 10.4244/eijv4i3a60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  9 in total

Review 1.  Surgical implant techniques of left ventricular assist devices: an overview of acute and durable devices.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  The Impella Recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Huy T Nguyen; Rucha Karajgikar; Samin K Sharma; Annapoorna S Kini
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Cardiogenic shock in ACS. Part 2: Role of mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Kyriakos Anastasiadis; George M Wieselthaler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Use of left ventricular support devices during acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jon Spiro; Sagar N Doshi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices: Available Modalities and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Mohammed Faluk; Syed Mustajab Hasan; Tianyu Jiang; Ramy Abdelmaseih; Jigar Patel
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2021-01-14

8.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices: new deus ex machina?

Authors:  Diego Arroyo; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-07-31

Review 9.  Percutaneous Mechanical Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Review.

Authors:  Fahad Syed Gilani; Sarah Farooqui; Rajiv Doddamani; Luis Gruberg
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.