Literature DB >> 25326232

Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplification and therapy response in the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic.

Denis L F Jardim1, Chad Tang2, Debora De Melo Gagliato1, Gerald S Falchook1, Kenneth Hess3, Filip Janku1, Siqing Fu1, Jennifer J Wheler1, Ralph G Zinner1, Aung Naing1, Apostolia M Tsimberidou1, Vijaykumar Holla4, Marylin M Li5, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri6, Raja Luthra6, Ravi Salgia7, Razelle Kurzrock8, Funda Meric-Bernstam1, David S Hong9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status.
RESULTS: Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P = 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12; 95% confidence intervals, 0.83-1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%). No patient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response.
CONCLUSION: MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25326232     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  40 in total

1.  Promise and challenges on the horizon of MET-targeted cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Yu-Wen Zhang
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-05-26

2.  Rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy in advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (RILOMET-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Daniel V T Catenacci; Niall C Tebbutt; Irina Davidenko; André M Murad; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; David H Ilson; Sergei Tjulandin; Evengy Gotovkin; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Igor Bondarenko; Mohamedtaki A Tejani; Anghel A Udrea; Mustapha Tehfe; Ferdinando De Vita; Cheryl Turkington; Rui Tang; Agnes Ang; Yilong Zhang; Tien Hoang; Roger Sidhu; David Cunningham
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Update on Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Steven B Maron; Daniel V T Catenacci
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 4.  Novel Targeted Therapies for Esophagogastric Cancer.

Authors:  Steven B Maron; Daniel V T Catenacci
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.495

5.  Revisiting MET: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic, MET-Amplified Esophagogastric Cancers.

Authors:  Surendra Pal Chaudhary; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; Theodore S Hong; Katie L Hwang; Jochen K Lennerz; Ryan B Corcoran; Rebecca S Heist; Andrea L Russo; Aparna Parikh; Darrell R Borger; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jason E Faris; Janet E Murphy; Christopher G Azzoli; Eric J Roeland; Lipika Goyal; Jill Allen; John T Mullen; David P Ryan; A John Iafrate; Samuel J Klempner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-12

6.  Clinical and prognostic value of MET gene copy number gain and chromosome 7 polysomy in primary colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  An Na Seo; Kyoung Un Park; Gheeyoung Choe; Woo Ho Kim; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 7.  The Therapeutic Potential of Targeting the HGF/cMET Axis in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Kim Moran-Jones
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Whole-exome sequencing identifies key mutated genes in T790M wildtype/cMET-unamplified lung adenocarcinoma with acquired resistance to first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Chenguang Li; Hailin Liu; Bin Zhang; Liqun Gong; Yanjun Su; Zhenfa Zhang; Changli Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  MET-dependent solid tumours - molecular diagnosis and targeted therapy.

Authors:  Robin Guo; Jia Luo; Jason Chang; Natasha Rekhtman; Maria Arcila; Alexander Drilon
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Novel targeted therapies in adrenocortical carcinoma.

Authors:  Bhavana Konda; Lawrence S Kirschner
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.