Literature DB >> 25325894

Real-time dynamic intraocular pressure fluctuations during microcoaxial phacoemulsification using different aspiration flow rates and their impact on early postoperative outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Vaishali Vasavada, Shetal M Raj, Mamidipudi R Praveen, Abhay R Vasavada, Bonnie A Henderson, Priyadarshi K Asnani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the impact of varying fluidic parameters on intraoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations and postoperative outcomes.
METHODS: Prospective randomized study of 80 eyes undergoing cataract surgery that were randomly assigned to low (aspiration flow rate: 20 cc/min; bottle height: 90 cm; vacuum: 400 mm Hg) and high (aspiration flow rate: 40 cc/min; bottle height: 110 cm; vacuum: 400 mm Hg) fluidic parameter groups. Real-time dynamic intraoperative IOP was measured during nuclear fragment removal. Mean maximum and minimum IOP and percentage reduction in IOP from maximum were compared between groups. Postoperatively, the rate of change in central corneal thickness and anterior chamber inflammation at days 1 and 7, endothelial cell density at 3 months, and corneal clarity on day 1 were compared.
RESULTS: Minimum IOP in the low and high parameters groups was 35 ± 4.0 and 34.5 ± 6.8 mm Hg, respectively. Maximum IOP in the low and high parameters groups was 69 ± 3.0 and 85 ± 1.2 mm Hg, respectively (P < .002). Mean percent reduction from maximum was 59% in the high parameters group compared to 41% in the low parameters group, with the difference being statistically significant (P < .002). Rate of change in central corneal thickness was greater in the high parameters group at postoperative days 1 and 7 (P < .001). Anterior chamber inflammation and corneal clarity on the first postoperative day were significantly better in the low parameters group.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher aspiration flow rate and bottle heights are associated with high intraoperative IOPs of up to 85 mm Hg. Prolonged elevated IOP during cataract surgery was found to have more anterior segment inflammation and more edematous corneas. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25325894     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140711-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  13 in total

1.  Reply: Transient retinal artery occlusion during phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Authors:  I H Yusuf; T H M Fung; M Wasik; C K Patel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Air pressure changes in the creation and bursting of the type-1 big bubble in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  S L AlTaan; I Mohammed; D G Said; H S Dua
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Elevated intraocular pressure causes cellular and molecular retinal injuries, advocating a more moderate intraocular pressure setting during phacoemulsification surgery.

Authors:  Zhenni Zhao; Xiaowei Yu; Xue Yang; Jiamin Zhang; Dandan Zhang; Nannan Sun; Zhigang Fan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Changes in the peripapillary vasculature and macular thickness after cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems with optical coherence tomography angiography.

Authors:  Liang-Zhang Tan; Fang Tian; Lu Chen; Li-Na Sun; Xue Gong; Jing-Li Liang; Hong Zhang; Xiao-Rong Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Does low infusion pressure microincision cataract surgery (LIPMICS) reduce frequency of post-occlusion breaks?

Authors:  Hanga Beres; Diego de Ortueta; Benedikt Buehner; Gabor Bernd Scharioth
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

6.  Comparison of intra-ocular pressure changes with liquid or flat applanation interfaces in a femtosecond laser platform.

Authors:  G P Williams; H P Ang; B L George; Y C Liu; G Peh; L Izquierdo; D T Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Electroretinographic evaluations of retinal function before, just after, and after intravitreal injections.

Authors:  Kazuma Yagura; Kei Shinoda; Soiti Matsumoto; Gaku Terauchi; Makoto Kawashima; Emiko Watanabe; Harue Matsumoto; Takeshi Iwata; Atsushi Mizota; Yozo Miyake
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Publication rates from the All India Ophthalmic Conference 2010 compared to 2000: Are we improving?

Authors:  R Kumaragurupari; Sabyasachi Sengupta; Sahil Bhandari
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Vascular Occlusions following Ocular Surgical Procedures: A Clinical Observation of Vascular Complications after Ocular Surgery.

Authors:  Charlotte Fischer; Anne Bruggemann; Annette Hager; Josep Callizo Planas; Johann Roider; Hans Hoerauf
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Injection time related to intraocular pressure using a CO2 driven preloaded injector: An experimental laboratory study.

Authors:  Jan N Weindler; Tadas Naujokaitis; Sonja K Schickhardt; Ramin Khoramnia; Gerd U Auffarth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.