Literature DB >> 2532529

Risk indicators in low back pain.

M H Pope1.   

Abstract

Injuries leading to low back pain can occur by direct trauma, overexertion or repetitive trauma. Overexertion is claimed by 60% of low back pain patients as the cause of injury. Of these patients with overexertion injuries, 66% implicated lifting and 20% pushing or pulling. It is, however, difficult to relate the workplace to the complaint of low back pain in a specific worker, and low back pain is found quite often in those with sedentary occupations. The incidence, severity and potential disability are all related to the demands on the individual in the workplace. Among the factors implicated are the requirements for lifting (particularly when compared to the worker's lifting capacity), pushing and pulling, posture, and cyclic loading. Drivers of heavy vehicles have two to four times the average incidence of serious low back pain. This is probably due to the cyclic loading environment. The general psychosocial environment (including that at work) is an important risk factor. The first attack of low back pain occurs in the teens or twenties. Low back pain is as frequent in females as males, although women in manual materials handling jobs are at greater risk. Posture, anthropometry and mobility measures have limited prognostic value. Muscle strength and physical fitness probably have some value. Radiographic findings have little pragmatic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2532529     DOI: 10.3109/07853898909149226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med        ISSN: 0785-3890            Impact factor:   4.709


  7 in total

1.  Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain.

Authors:  Lauren E Griffith; Harry S Shannon; Richard P Wells; Stephen D Walter; Donald C Cole; Pierre Côté; John Frank; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Lacey E Langlois
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Cross-sectional view of factors associated with back pain.

Authors:  Chung-Yol Lee; Renato Kratter; Nicole Duvoisin; Aydin Taskin; Julian Schilling
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  A cost-benefit analysis of a California county's back injury prevention program.

Authors:  L Shi
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Low back pain and other overuse injuries in a group of Japanese triathletes.

Authors:  J S Manninen; M Kallinen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

6.  Risk Factors Linked to Psychological Distress, Productivity Losses, and Sick Leave in Low-Back-Pain Employees: A Three-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Angelo Compare; Paolo Marchettini; Cristina Zarbo
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-18

7.  User Assessment of a Novel Suspension for a Wheelchair-A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Trial.

Authors:  Uriel Giwnewer; Guy Rubin; Alex Friedman; Nimrod Rozen
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.