Literature DB >> 8464977

A cost-benefit analysis of a California county's back injury prevention program.

L Shi1.   

Abstract

Back-related injuries have become a major health problem in the workplace, affecting as many as 35 percent of the work force and accounting for about 25 percent of all compensation claims. This study evaluates a back injury prevention program among employees in a northern California county in 1989-90. Six divisions of the county government were selected for the study because they had the highest prevalence of back pain experienced and the most back-related injuries in recent years. Four of the six divisions were randomly selected as the intervention group and the remaining two, the control group. Overall, 77 percent or 205 of the targeted employees in the intervention group participated in the study. The intervention group was given an identical health risk assessment (HRA) before and after the 1-year back injury prevention program that offered employees a combination of education, training, physical fitness activities, and ergonomic improvement. The control group was neither given the HRA nor offered the program. The back injury and cost data of both the control and intervention groups were collected before and after the 1-year intervention. The results showed a modest overall decline in back pain prevalence rates, but significant improvement in satisfaction and reduction in risky behaviors. Cost-benefit analysis showed the net benefit of introducing back injury prevention program was $161,108, and the return on investment is 179 percent. Therefore, the study offers suggestive evidence for the initial benefits of a back injury prevention program and lends support to the widely held belief that health promotion in the workplace can reduce employee health risks, increase healthful behaviors and attitudes, and improve attitudes toward the employer organization.Whether such intervention will continue to reap benefits in future years depends, to a large extent,on a favorable work environment and the maintenance and continuation of positive behavioral changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8464977      PMCID: PMC1403362     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  27 in total

1.  Measuring the diffusion of innovative health promotion programs.

Authors:  A Steckler; R M Goodman; K R McLeroy; S Davis; G Koch
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb

2.  Health habits, health care use and costs in a sample of retirees.

Authors:  J P Leigh; J F Fries
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Low back pain in industry: epidemiological aspects.

Authors:  G Andersson
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1979

4.  A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors.

Authors:  D B Chaffin; K S Park
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1973-12

5.  The economics of cancer prevention and detection: getting more for less.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Strenuous working conditions and musculo-skeletal disorders among female hospital workers.

Authors:  M Estryn-Behar; M Kaminski; E Peigne; M F Maillard; A Pelletier; C Berthier; M F Delaporte; M C Paoli; J M Leroux
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Factors contributing to the development of low back pain in industrial workers.

Authors:  J R Brown
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1975-01

8.  Effect of physical training and ergonomic counselling on the psychological perception of work and on the subjective assessment of low-back insufficiency.

Authors:  O Dehlin; S Berg; G B Andersson; G Grimby
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1981

Review 9.  Epidemiologic aspects on low-back pain in industry.

Authors:  G B Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Epidemiologic studies of low-back pain.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; M H Pope; M C Costanza; J C Rosen; J E Goggin; D G Wilder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of interventions to prevent injuries: an overview.

Authors:  A L Dannenberg; C J Fowler
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions: a ranking-type Delphi.

Authors:  Daniel Neumann; Victor Tiberius; Florin Biendarra
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.298

3.  The cost-effectiveness of a back education program for firefighters: a case study.

Authors:  Peter Kim; Jill A Hayden; Silvano A Mior
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-03

Review 4.  Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a company's perspective: a systematic review of methods to estimate the cost of health-related productivity loss.

Authors:  Kimi Uegaki; Martine C de Bruijne; Allard J van der Beek; Willem van Mechelen; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

5.  What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours.

Authors:  Meredith Chapman; Matthew Thomas; Kirrilly Thompson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Economic Evaluation of Occupational Safety and Health Interventions From the Employer Perspective: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aikaterini Grimani; Gunnar Bergström; Martha Isabel Riaño Casallas; Emmanuel Aboagye; Irene Jensen; Malin Lohela-Karlsson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.162

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.