Literature DB >> 25324085

Benefits of preserving stationary and time-varying formant structure in alternative representations of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Susan Nittrouer1, Joanna H Lowenstein1, Taylor Wucinich1, Eric Tarr1.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants have improved speech recognition for deaf individuals, but further modifications are required before performance will match that of normal-hearing listeners. In this study, the hypotheses were tested that (1) implant processing would benefit from efforts to preserve the structure of the low-frequency formants and (2) time-varying aspects of that structure would be especially beneficial. Using noise-vocoded and sine-wave stimuli with normal-hearing listeners, two experiments examined placing boundaries between static spectral channels to optimize representation of the first two formants and preserving time-varying formant structure. Another hypothesis tested in this study was that children might benefit more than adults from strategies that preserve formant structure, especially time-varying structure. Sixty listeners provided data to each experiment: 20 adults and 20 children at each of 5 and 7 years old. Materials were consonant-vowel-consonant words, four-word syntactically correct, meaningless sentences, and five-word syntactically correct, meaningful sentences. Results showed that listeners of all ages benefited from having channel boundaries placed to optimize information about the first two formants, and benefited even more from having time-varying structure. Children showed greater gains than adults only for time-varying formant structure. Results suggest that efforts would be well spent trying to design processing strategies that preserve formant structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25324085      PMCID: PMC4223981          DOI: 10.1121/1.4895698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; R V Shannon; A S Martinez; J Wygonski; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluation of the Computer-assisted Speech Perception Assessment Test (CASPA).

Authors:  C L Mackersie; A Boothroyd; D Minniear
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Frequency mapping in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Effect of frequency boundary assignment on vowel recognition with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.

Authors:  Marios S Fourakis; John W Hawks; Laura K Holden; Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Eric Tarr; Virginia Bolster; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Limits on alternative auditory representations of speech.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants.

Authors:  D Kewley-Port; D B Pisoni; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The bimodal perception of speech in infancy.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; A N Meltzoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Frederick Gallun; Richard Wright
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.297

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.