Literature DB >> 25322018

Quantitative technique for robust and noise-tolerant speed measurements based on speckle decorrelation in optical coherence tomography.

Néstor Uribe-Patarroyo, Martin Villiger, Brett E Bouma.   

Abstract

Intensity-based techniques in optical coherence tomography (OCT), such as those based on speckle decorrelation, have attracted great interest for biomedical and industrial applications requiring speed or flow information. In this work we present a rigorous analysis of the effects of noise on speckle decorrelation, demonstrate that these effects frustrate accurate speed quantitation, and propose new techniques that achieve quantitative and repeatable measurements. First, we derive the effect of background noise on the speckle autocorrelation function, finding two detrimental effects of noise. We propose a new autocorrelation function that is immune to the main effect of background noise and permits quantitative measurements at high and moderate signal-to-noise ratios. At the same time, this autocorrelation function is able to provide motion contrast information that accurately identifies areas with movement, similar to speckle variance techniques. In order to extend the SNR range, we quantify and model the second effect of background noise on the autocorrelation function through a calibration. By obtaining an explicit expression for the decorrelation time as a function of speed and diffusion, we show how to use our autocorrelation function and noise calibration to measure a flowing liquid. We obtain accurate results, which are validated by Doppler OCT, and demonstrate a very high dynamic range (> 600 mm/s) compared to that of Doppler OCT (±25 mm/s). We also derive the behavior for low flows, and show that there is an inherent non-linearity in speed measurements in the presence of diffusion due to statistical fluctuations of speckle. Our technique allows quantitative and robust measurements of speeds using OCT, and this work delimits precisely the conditions in which it is accurate.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25322018      PMCID: PMC4247190          DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.024411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Express        ISSN: 1094-4087            Impact factor:   3.894


  30 in total

1.  Dynamic noise correction for IVUS quantitative volume blood flow: methods and numerical validation.

Authors:  Fermin A Lupotti; Chris L De Korte; Frits Mastik; Antonius F W Van Der Steen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  J F de Boer; T E Milner; M J van Gemert; J S Nelson
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Removing the depth-degeneracy in optical frequency domain imaging with frequency shifting.

Authors:  S Yun; G Tearney; J de Boer; B Bouma
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Optical coherence tomography– 15 years in cardiology.

Authors:  Taishi Yonetsu; Brett E Bouma; Koji Kato; James G Fujimoto; Ik-Kyung Jang
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.993

5.  Blood flow velocity quantification using split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jason Tokayer; Yali Jia; Al-Hafeez Dhalla; David Huang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Autocorrelation optical coherence tomography for mapping transverse particle-flow velocity.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Ruikang Wang
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Principal-component-analysis-based estimation of blood flow velocities using optical coherence tomography intensity signals.

Authors:  Nishant Mohan; Benjamin Vakoc
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Blood flow imaging and volume flow quantitation with intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  W Li; A F van der Steen; C T Lancée; I Céspedes; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Dynamic light scattering optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jonghwan Lee; Weicheng Wu; James Y Jiang; Bo Zhu; David A Boas
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Quantitative imaging of cerebral blood flow velocity and intracellular motility using dynamic light scattering-optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jonghwan Lee; Harsha Radhakrishnan; Weicheng Wu; Ali Daneshmand; Mihail Climov; Cenk Ayata; David A Boas
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.200

View more
  18 in total

1.  Laminar microvascular transit time distribution in the mouse somatosensory cortex revealed by Dynamic Contrast Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Conrad W Merkle; Vivek J Srinivasan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Robust motion tracking based on adaptive speckle decorrelation analysis of OCT signal.

Authors:  Yuewen Wang; Yahui Wang; Ali Akansu; Kevin D Belfield; Basil Hubbi; Xuan Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Rotational distortion correction in endoscopic optical coherence tomography based on speckle decorrelation.

Authors:  Néstor Uribe-Patarroyo; Brett E Bouma
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  Noise and bias in optical coherence tomography intensity signal decorrelation.

Authors:  Néstor Uribe-Patarroyo; Anouk L Post; Sebastián Ruiz-Lopera; Dirk J Faber; Brett E Bouma
Journal:  OSA Contin       Date:  2020-03-17

5.  Intravascular optical coherence tomography [Invited].

Authors:  Brett E Bouma; Martin Villiger; Kenichiro Otsuka; Wang-Yuhl Oh
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Measurement of biofilm growth and local hydrodynamics using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Nicolás Weiss; Khalid El Tayeb El Obied; Jeroen Kalkman; Rob G H Lammertink; Ton G van Leeuwen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Comparison of amplitude-decorrelation, speckle-variance and phase-variance OCT angiography methods for imaging the human retina and choroid.

Authors:  Iwona Gorczynska; Justin V Migacz; Robert J Zawadzki; Arlie G Capps; John S Werner
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Optical coherence tomography velocimetry based on decorrelation estimation of phasor pair ratios (DEPPAIR).

Authors:  Maximilian G O Gräfe; Oleg Nadiarnykh; Johannes F De Boer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Forward multiple scattering dominates speckle decorrelation in whole-blood flowmetry using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Natalie G Ferris; Taylor M Cannon; Martin Villiger; Brett E Bouma; Néstor Uribe-Patarroyo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Velocity gradients in spatially resolved laser Doppler flowmetry and dynamic light scattering with confocal and coherence gating.

Authors:  Néstor Uribe-Patarroyo; Brett E Bouma
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.529

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.