Literature DB >> 25321091

Motion management within two respiratory-gating windows: feasibility study of dual quasi-breath-hold technique in gated medical procedures.

Taeho Kim1, Siyong Kim, Yang-Kyun Park, Kaylin K Youn, Paul Keall, Rena Lee.   

Abstract

A dual quasi-breath-hold (DQBH) technique is proposed for respiratory motion management (a hybrid technique combining breathing-guidance with breath-hold task in the middle). The aim of this study is to test a hypothesis that the DQBH biofeedback system improves both the capability of motion management and delivery efficiency. Fifteen healthy human subjects were recruited for two respiratory motion measurements (free breathing and DQBH biofeedback breathing for 15 min). In this study, the DQBH biofeedback system utilized the abdominal position obtained using an real-time position management (RPM) system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA) to audio-visually guide a human subject for 4 s breath-hold at EOI and 90% EOE (EOE90%) to improve delivery efficiency. We investigated the residual respiratory motion and the delivery efficiency (duty-cycle) of abdominal displacement within the gating window. The improvement of the abdominal motion reproducibility was evaluated in terms of cycle-to-cycle displacement variability, respiratory period and baseline drift. The DQBH biofeedback system improved the abdominal motion management capability compared to that with free breathing. With a phase based gating (mean ± std: 55  ±  5%), the averaged root mean square error (RMSE) of the abdominal displacement in the dual-gating windows decreased from 2.26 mm of free breathing to 1.16 mm of DQBH biofeedback (p-value = 0.007). The averaged RMSE of abdominal displacement over the entire respiratory cycles reduced from 2.23 mm of free breathing to 1.39 mm of DQBH biofeedback breathing in the dual-gating windows (p-value = 0.028). The averaged baseline drift dropped from 0.9 mm min(-1) with free breathing to 0.09 mm min(-1) with DQBH biofeedback (p-value = 0.048). The averaged duty-cycle with an 1 mm width of displacement bound increased from 15% of free breathing to 26% of DQBH biofeedback (p-value = 0.003). The study demonstrated that the DQBH biofeedback system has the potential to significantly reduce the residual respiratory motion with the improved duty cycle during the respiratory gating procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25321091     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Breath-hold MR-HIFU hyperthermia: phantom and in vivo feasibility.

Authors:  Chenchen Bing; Bingbing Cheng; Robert M Staruch; Joris Nofiele; Michelle Wodzak Staruch; Debra Szczepanski; Alan Farrow-Gillespie; Adeline Yang; Theodore W Laetsch; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.914

2.  Dosimetric impact of baseline drift in volumetric modulated arc therapy with breath holding.

Authors:  Shunsuke Ono; Yoshihiro Ueda; Shoki Inui; Masaru Isono; Shingo Ohira; Seiya Murata; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Teruki Teshima
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-06-08

3.  Audiovisual biofeedback guided breath-hold improves lung tumor position reproducibility and volume consistency.

Authors:  Danny Lee; Peter B Greer; Carminia Lapuz; Joanna Ludbrook; Perry Hunter; Jameen Arm; Sean Pollock; Kuldeep Makhija; Ricky T O'Brien; Taeho Kim; Paul Keall
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-10

4.  Direct tumor visual feedback during free breathing in 0.35T MRgRT.

Authors:  Taeho Kim; Benjamin C Lewis; Alex Price; Thomas Mazur; H Michael Gach; Justin C Park; Bin Cai; Erin Wittland; Lauren Henke; Hyun Kim; Sasa Mutic; Olga Green
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Visually guided respiratory motion management for Ethos adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Taeho Kim; Zhen Ji; Benjamin Lewis; Eric Laugeman; Alex Price; Yao Hao; Geoffrey Hugo; Nels Knutson; Bin Cai; Hyun Kim; Lauren Henke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.