| Literature DB >> 25320558 |
Bao Yan1, Rongjia Liu1, Yibo Li1, Yan Wang1, Guanjun Gao1, Qinglu Zhang1, Xing Liu1, Gonghao Jiang2, Yuqing He1.
Abstract
Rice grain shape and yield are usually controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci (QTL). This study used a set of F9-10 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from a cross of Huahui 3 (Bt/Xa21) and Zhongguoxiangdao, and detected 27 QTLs on ten rice chromosomes. Among them, twelve QTLs responsive for grain shape/ or yield were mostly reproducibly detected and had not yet been reported before. Interestingly, the two known genes involved in the materials, with one insect-resistant Bt gene, and the other disease-resistant Xa21 gene, were found to closely link the QTLs responsive for grain shape and weight. The Bt fragment insertion was firstly mapped on the chromosome 10 in Huahui 3 and may disrupt grain-related QTLs resulting in weaker yield performance in transgenic plants. The introgression of Xa21 gene by backcrossing from donor material into receptor Minghui 63 may also contain a donor linkage drag which included minor-effect QTL alleles positively affecting grain shape and yield. The QTL analysis on rice grain appearance quality exemplified the typical events of transgenic or backcrossing breeding. The QTL findings in this study will in the future facilitate the gene isolation and breeding application for improvement of rice grain shape and yield.Entities:
Keywords: Bt gene; Oryza sativa L.; QTL; grain shape and weight
Year: 2014 PMID: 25320558 PMCID: PMC4154612 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.64.231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Statistics of the trait performance between Minghui 63 and its improved version in 2009 (upper) and 2010 (lower)
| parents | GL (mm) | GW (mm) | GT (mm) | TGW (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minghui 63 (CK) | 9.81 ± 0.11 | 2.89 ± 0.04 | 1.93 ± 0.04 | 29.7 ± 1.4 |
| 9.83 ± 0.13 | 2.90 ± 0.05 | 1.97 ± 0.05 | 28.3 ± 0.4 | |
| Minghui 63/ | 9.42 ± 0.11** | 2.72 ± 0.01** | 1.91 ± 0.04 | 25.6 ± 0.8** |
| 9.60 ± 0.22** | 2.78 ± 0.04** | 1.89 ± 0.02** | 24.8 ± 0.5** | |
| Minghui 63/ | 9.82 ± 0.12 | 2.90 ± 0.07 | 1.94 ± 0.06 | 29.9 ± 1.3 |
| 9.84 ± 0.14 | 2.92 ± 0.03 | 1.98 ± 0.02 | 28.7 ± 0.7 | |
| Huahui 3 (Minghui | 9.44 ± 0.11** | 2.73 ± 0.05** | 1.92 ± 0.06 | 25.6 ± 0.5** |
| 63/ | 9.61 ± 0.4** | 2.78 ± 0.04** | 1.89 ± 0.06* | 25.0 ± 1.0** |
Significantly different from the performance of Minghui 63 at * P ≤ 0.05 and ** P ≤ 0.01.
Statistics of the five traits in parents of Zhongguoxiandao (ZGX) and Huahui 3 (HH 3) and the derived recombination inbred line (RIL) population observed in 2009 (upper) and 2010 (lower)
| Parent (mean ± standard error) | RILs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Traits | HH 3 | ZGX | Mean ± standard error | Range |
| GL (mm) | 9.44 ± 0.11 | 9.93 ± 0.06 | 9.71 ± 0.44 | 7.04–10.76 |
| 9.61 ± 0.40 | 9.83 ± 0.08 | 9.68 ± 0.38 | 8.26–10.75 | |
| GW (mm) | 2.73 ± 0.05 | 2.70 ± 0.02 | 2.77 ± 0.14 | 2.03–3.53 |
| 2.78 ± 0.04 | 2.60 ± 0.02 | 2.77 ± 0.12 | 2.47–3.40 | |
| GT (mm) | 1.92 ± 0.06 | 1.99 ± 0.05 | 1.95 ± 0.09 | 1.76–2.73 |
| 1.89 ± 0.06 | 1.94 ± 0.05 | 1.95 ± 0.06 | 1.74–2.30 | |
| LWR | 3.45 ± 0.03 | 3.67 ± 0.02 | 3.51 ± 0.22 | 2.48–4.68 |
| 3.45 ± 0.05 | 3.78 ± 0.03 | 3.50 ± 0.18 | 2.61–3.98 | |
| TGW (g) | 25.6 ± 0.5 | 27.3 ± 0.2 | 26.2 ± 2.3 | 20.7–33.4 |
| 25.0 ± 1.0 | 26.5 ± 0.5 | 26.3 ± 2.5 | 20.5–37.7 | |
GL, GW and GT are grain length, width and thickness, respectively.
LWR, length/width ratio. TGW, 1000-grain weight.
Fig. 1Frequency distributions of the RILs derived from a cross between Huahui 3 and Zhongguoxiangdao for 6 traits measured in 2009 and 2010. Black and white arrows indicate the mean values of the parental lines, Zhongguoxiangdao and Huahui3, respectively. Abbrevations are the same as in Table 1.
Correlation coefficients among the parameters from 237 RILs derived from the cross of Zhongguoxiandao (ZGX) and Huahui 3 (HH 3) in 2009 (upper half) and 2010 (lower half)
| GL (mm) | GW (mm) | LWR | GT (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GW (mm) | 0.15 | |||
| 0.24 | ||||
| LWR | 0.58 | −0.71 | ||
| 0.56 | −0.67 | |||
| GT (mm) | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.02 | |
| 0.48 | 0.69 | −0.21 | ||
| TGW (g) | 0.56 | 0.50 | −0.02 | 0.71 |
| 0.66 | 0.71 | −0.10 | 0.83 |
P ≤ 0.05,
P ≤ 0.01. Abbrevations are the same as in Table 1.
Correlation coefficients in upper half correspond to the data in 2009 and those in lower half correspond to the data in 2010.
QTLs detected for rice grain size and weight using the F9:10 RIL population derived from a cross between Zhongguoxiandao (ZGX) and Huahui 3 (HH 3) by the interval mapping at LOD threshold 2.4
| Trait | QTLs | Chr. | Interval markers | 2009 | 2010 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| LOD | A | h2 (%) | LOD | A | h2 (%) | ||||
| GL | 1 | RM220–RM243 | 2.96 | −0.07 | 3.80 | ||||
| 8 | RM310–RM547 | 2.80 | 0.09 | 3.88 | 5.55 | 0.10 | 6.72 | ||
| 9 | RM566–RM434 | 4.65 | 0.13 | 8.10 | 5.37 | 0.12 | 8.21 | ||
| − | − | ||||||||
| GW | 2 | RM262–RM106 | 2.61 | 0.03 | 5.23 | ||||
| 3 | RM55–RM7000 | 4.4 | 0.05 | 10.5 | 6.52 | 0.05 | 15.21 | ||
| 4 | RM16434–RM16502 | 4.22 | 0.03 | 5.10 | |||||
| − | − | ||||||||
| 11 | RM332–RM116 | 4.13 | 0.04 | 7.12 | 4.45 | 0.04 | 9.65 | ||
| 11 | RM26643–XA | 4.25 | 0.04 | 9.65 | |||||
| LWR | 2 | RM324–RM5521 | 2.83 | −0.07 | 8.19 | 4.56 | −0.05 | 6.54 | |
| 3 | RM55–RM7000 | 3.08 | −0.06 | 9.41 | |||||
| 5 | RM169–RM3381 | 2.59 | 0.05 | 4.58 | 2.62 | 0.03 | 3.47 | ||
| − | |||||||||
| − | − | ||||||||
| 11 | RM332–RM116 | 3.19 | −0.05 | 5.23 | 3.46 | −0.04 | 5.02 | ||
| GT | 3 | RM1373–RM7000 | 3.34 | 0.02 | 5.10 | 3.01 | 0.01 | 3.92 | |
| 4 | RM261–RM6659 | 2.54 | 0.01 | 3.27 | |||||
| 5 | RM593–RM0366 | 3.33 | −0.01 | 4.25 | |||||
| − | − | ||||||||
| 11 | RM26643–XA | 3.32 | 0.02 | 5.08 | 3.48 | 0.02 | 5.46 | ||
| TGW | 3 | RM55–RM7000 | 7.17 | 0.91 | 15.46 | 5.60 | 0.85 | 9.06 | |
| 4 | RM16459–RM16502 | 3.51 | 0.42 | 3.41 | |||||
| 5 | RM593–RM0366 | 4.35 | −0.54 | 4.65 | 4.57 | −0.61 | 5.39 | ||
| − | − | ||||||||
| 11 | RM26092–RM116 | 2.89 | 0.55 | 3.94 | |||||
| 11 | RM26643–XA | 5.80 | 0.71 | 8.47 | 4.42 | 0.66 | 6.32 | ||
Chromosome number.
Additive effects, the positive values indicate the alleles from Huahui 3 increasing the effects.
h2, the total phenotypic variation explained by each QTL.
The QTL around the Bt transgene insertion point is marked in boldface.
Fig. 2Locations of QTLs controlling rice grain size and weight detected in 2009 and 2010, respectively. The number on the top of each chromosome indicates the chromosome order. The insertion location of the Bt gene co-located with a major QTL cluster for rice grain size and weight is marked on chromosome 10.
Epistatic effects and environmental interactions of QTLs identified in the RIL population in 2009 and 2010
| Traits | Ch-Ini | Interval_i | QTL | Ch-Inj | Interval_j | QTL | ai | h2ai | aj | h2aj | aaij | h2aaij | aei | h2aei | aej | h2aej | h2aeij |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GL | 9-5 | RM566-RM434 | 10-4 | RM1126-RM467 | −0.20 | 19.9 | −0.06 | 1.05 | 0.0001 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||
| GW | 4-8 | RM261-RM6659 | 11-8 | XA-RM224 | 0.22 | 2.4 | 0.03 | 5.81 | −0.02 | 0.95 | 0.06 | ||||||
| 3-8 | RM15281-RM487 | 10-4 | RM1126-RM467 | −0.01 | 0.53 | 0.16 | |||||||||||
| 1-10 | RM449-RM595 | 10-4 | RM1126-RM467 | −0.03 | 4.93 | ||||||||||||
| GT | 1-3 | RM3252-RM1 | 10-3 | −0.03 | 4.08 | −0.04 | 12.4 | −0.02 | 1.12 | −0.0069 | 0.26 | 0.0007 | 0.5 | 0.34 | |||
| 3-15 | RM422-RM514 | 10-3 | 0.02 | 5.18 | −0.04 | 12.4 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.0071 | 0.28 | 0.0007 | 0.5 | 0.59 | ||||
| 4-10 | RM16459-RM401 | 10-3 | 0.02 | 2.45 | −0.04 | 12.4 | 0.01 | 0.8 | 0.0006 | 0.05 | 0.0007 | 0.5 | 0.14 | ||||
| 5-4 | RM593-MRG0366 | 10-3 | −0.04 | 12.4 | 0.02 | 1.69 | 0.0007 | 0.5 | 0.47 | ||||||||
| TGW | 5-2 | MRG2228-RM413 | 11-8 | XA-RM224 | −0.5 | 6.62 | 0.4 | 3.55 | −0.3 | 0.85 | 0.002 | 0.02 |
Ch-Ini and Ch-Inj represent the chromosome number-interval of the points being tested in the analysis.
ai and aj are the additive effects of the test points i and j, respectively. Positive values of ai and aj imply that the Huahui 3 genotype has a positive effect on that trait.
h2ai, h2aj, h2aaij, h2aei and h2aej are the percentages of the phenotypic variations explained by ai, aj, aaij, aei and aej respectively.
aaij is the effect of additive-by-additive interaction between points i and j; a positive value indicates that the parental two-locus genotypes have a positive effect on the traits and that the recombinants have a negative effect.
aei and aej are effects of the environmental interaction of locus i and j, respectively; a positive value implies that the effect in 2010 is larger than in 2009.