Literature DB >> 25320163

Leaders benefit followers in the collective movement of a social sawfly.

L K Hodgkin1, M R E Symonds2, M A Elgar3.   

Abstract

The challenges of maintaining cohesion while making collective decisions in social or aggregating insects can result in the emergence of a leader or leaders. Larval aggregations of the steel-blue sawfly Perga affinis forage nocturnally, and some larvae lead the aggregation on foraging trips more often than expected by chance. We investigated the relationship between these leader and follower roles by comparing the weight and growth of individual larvae with different roles. Our observations reveal no significant difference between the growth of leaders and followers, suggesting that the role of leadership may not provide direct foraging benefits. However, by experimentally manipulating the social structure of larval aggregations, we found that individuals within aggregations that comprise a mixture of leaders and followers enjoy higher growth rates than those in aggregations comprising a single behavioural type. These data demonstrate, for the first time, individual benefits to maintaining a balance of leader and follower roles within larval aggregations, and highlight the importance of considering the perspectives of both leaders and followers when investigating the evolutionary significance of this behavioural variation within animal groups.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collective movement; consensus decision-making; followers; larval aggregation; leadership

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25320163      PMCID: PMC4213643          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs.

Authors:  Sean A Rands; Guy Cowlishaw; Richard A Pettifor; J Marcus Rowcliffe; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements.

Authors:  Odile Petit; Richard Bon
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 3.  Follow me! I'm a leader if you do; I'm a failed initiator if you don't?

Authors:  Andrew J King
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin; Jens Krause; Nigel R Franks; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  "Leading according to need" in self-organizing groups.

Authors:  L Conradt; J Krause; I D Couzin; T J Roper
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Social feedback and the emergence of leaders and followers.

Authors:  Jennifer L Harcourt; Tzo Zen Ang; Gemma Sweetman; Rufus A Johnstone; Andrea Manica
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age.

Authors:  Karen McComb; Graeme Shannon; Sarah M Durant; Katito Sayialel; Rob Slotow; Joyce Poole; Cynthia Moss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Knowledgeable individuals lead collective decisions in ants.

Authors:  Nathalie Stroeymeyt; Nigel R Franks; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Moving together: Incidental leaders and naïve followers.

Authors:  Marie Hélène Pillot; Jacques Gautrais; Jeanne Gouello; Pablo Michelena; Angela Sibbald; Richard Bon
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Dominance and affiliation mediate despotism in a social primate.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Caitlin M S Douglas; Elise Huchard; Nick J B Isaac; Guy Cowlishaw
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  5 in total

1.  Solving the puzzle of collective action through inter-individual differences.

Authors:  Chris von Rueden; Sergey Gavrilets; Luke Glowacki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Social foraging and individual consistency in following behaviour: testing the information centre hypothesis in free-ranging vultures.

Authors:  Roi Harel; Orr Spiegel; Wayne M Getz; Ran Nathan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Small increases in group size improve small shoals' response to water flow in zebrafish.

Authors:  Piyumika S Suriyampola; Alec A Iruri-Tucker; Lyan Padilla-Veléz; Alejandra Enriquez; Delia S Shelton; Emília P Martins
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.394

Review 4.  From Individuals to Groups and Back: The Evolutionary Implications of Group Phenotypic Composition.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Pierre-Olivier Montiglio; Orr Spiegel
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Consensus and experience trump leadership, suppressing individual personality during social foraging.

Authors:  Nicholas D McDonald; Sean A Rands; Francesca Hill; Charlotte Elder; Christos C Ioannou
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.