Literature DB >> 25319370

Patient-, provider-, and system-level factors in low adherence to surveillance colonoscopy guidelines: implications for future interventions.

Caitlyn Braschi1, Debra J Pelto, Marie O Hennelly, Kristen K Lee, Brijen Shah, Guy H Montgomery, Steven H Itzkowitz, Lina Jandorf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with a history of advanced adenomas are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), yet rates of adherence to current surveillance colonoscopy guidelines are poor. We determined rates of referral and adherence to 3-year interval surveillance colonoscopy in patients with advanced adenomas and identified modifiable factors as possible intervention targets to improve surveillance referral and adherence in these at-risk patients.
METHODS: We reviewed electronic medical records (EMR) of patients (N = 103) who had pathology findings on screening colonoscopy that warranted a 3-year surveillance colonoscopy. We abstracted demographics, surveillance colonoscopy completion rate, documentation of initial pathology in the "Problem List" of the EMR, and timing and nature of visits to a primary care physician (PCP).
RESULTS: Only 22 (21.4 %) patients had a record of surveillance colonoscopy completion. Among non-completers, 50.6 % of patients had no PCP visit within a year of their surveillance due date, 19.8 % saw a PCP and were not referred, and 29.6 % saw a PCP and were referred to either a gastroenterology consultation or a surveillance colonoscopy. Pathology found on initial screening was noted in the Problem List of 77.3 % of completers but only 33.3 % of non-completers (p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Possible targets for interventions include using EMRs to improve physician communication and encouraging patients to have timely PCP visits and follow-through after colonoscopy referral. Clinical studies in this area have the potential to improve outcomes for patients by reducing CRC mortality through early detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25319370     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-014-9653-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  7 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Dennis M Super; Edward S Feldman; Kevin D Mullen; D R Ferguson; Arthur J McCullough
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Tzuyung D Kou; Jill S Barnholtz Sloan; Siran M Koroukian; Mark D Schluchter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  An alerting system improves adherence to follow-up recommendations from colonoscopy examinations.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Naama Neeman; James M Rabb; Jacob Y Shin; Bruce E Landon; Kumar Pallav; Z Myron Falchuk; Mark D Aronson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Sidney J Winawer; Michael J O'Brien; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Benjamin F Hankey; Weiji Shi; John H Bond; Melvin Schapiro; Joel F Panish; Edward T Stewart; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Examining racial disparities in colon cancer clinical delay in the Colon Cancer Patterns of Care in Chicago study.

Authors:  Lindsey A Jones; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Blase N Polite; Katherine C Brewer; Ajay V Maker; Heather A Pauls; Garth H Rauscher
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Evaluation of a multimedia outreach campaign for a multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening among non-medicare employer population in the United States.

Authors:  Martha E Shepherd; Ashlee Lecorps; Lori Inman; Lesley-Ann Miller-Wilson
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Knowledge of Polyp History and Recommended Follow-Up Among a Predominately African American Patient Population and the Impact of Patient Navigation.

Authors:  Cassandra Fritz; Keith Naylor; Karen Kim
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-09-03

4.  Receipt of Colonoscopy Following Diagnosis of Advanced Adenomas: An Analysis within Integrated Healthcare Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Dale McLerran; Yingye Zheng; Amit G Singal; Douglas A Corley; V Paul Doria-Rose; Chyke A Doubeni; Aruna Kamineni; Jennifer S Haas; Ethan A Halm; Celette Sugg Skinner; Ann G Zauber; Karen J Wernli; Elisabeth F Beaber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.254

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.