| Literature DB >> 25317313 |
Abstract
Little is known about specific outcomes and early experiences of total talar prosthesis replacement surgery in the current literature, and ankle arthroplasty in Southeast Asia. This study reported on four patients with talar loss or ankle arthritis. Patients were treated with a custom total talar prosthesis (anatomic-metallic version) replacement (TPR, n=1) or with total ankle replacement (TAR, n=3). Baseline data, including Visual-Analog-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) and Quality of Life scores via Short-Form-36 (SF-36), were collected for all patients. Mean follow-up time was 7.6 months. From preoperative to postoperative, VAS-FA score increased from 6.0 to 57.5, and SF-36 score increased from 19.3 to 73.7 in a patient with TPR. Mean VAS-FA scores increased from 51.5±15.6 to 85.7±4.7 (P=0.032), and mean SF-36 scores tended to increase from 65.2±13.3 to 99.3±1.2 (P=0.055) in TAR group. This study is the first report of anatomic-metallic TPR which appears to provide satisfactory outcomes for treatment of talar loss at a short-term follow-up. TAR also provides acceptable results for treatment of ankle arthritis at this point.Entities:
Keywords: ankle; talar prosthesis; talus; total ankle replacement
Year: 2014 PMID: 25317313 PMCID: PMC4195992 DOI: 10.4081/or.2014.5486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Rev (Pavia) ISSN: 2035-8164
Figure 1.Radiographs of a total right ankle replacement from the anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views. Radiographs of a left ankle following severe injury with total talar loss from an anteroposterior view (C), and from a lateral view after temporary external fixation (D). Radiographs of the total left talar prosthesis replacement from the anteroposterior (E) and lateral (F) views. G,H) A custom total talar prosthesis in anatomic-metallic version.
Figure 2.Mean ratios (*) of the anteroposterior (length) and medio-lateral (width) dimensions of the trochlea tali (TaALc/TaWc) in the current study (talar prosthesis), and the ratios of the means of the same dimensions reported in Fessy et al. [14] and Stagni et al. [13] and Kuo et al. [12] Mean ratios of the individual dimensions are also given above the bars. Abbreviations: TaALc, Trochlea tali central arc length: distance between the most anterior and posterior and proximal points of the trochlea tali, as seen in the sagittal projection of the talus or talar prosthesis (current study); TaWc, Trochlea tali width: width between medial and lateral crests of the talar dome at central location along mediolateral (M/L) axis).
Figure 3.Standing and walking appearance included ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion around three months after an implantation of a prosthesis in a left ankle.
The comparisons between the results in previous studies and the current study.
| Author | Prosthesis type | Prosthesis design | Scoring system | Validity of scoring system | Overall results | Subtalar motion after implantation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angthong[ | Total talus | Anatomic | VAS-FA SF-36 | Adequate | Satisfactory | Excellent |
| Harnroongroj | Talar body | Non-anatomic | AOFAS | Inadequate | Satisfactory | Restriction |
| Taniguchi | Talar body | Anatomic | AOFAS | Inadequate | Mixed | N/A |
VAS-FA, Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle; SF-36, Health-related Quality of Life via Short-Form 36 score; AOFAS, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot scoring system; N/A, not applicable
*Anaomic design using three-dimensional computed tomography imaging of the contralateral talus with computer graphics and talar profiles was shown anatomically.
°No data was shown about the processing of talar shape using special imaging or computed tomography.
#Anaomic design using three-dimensional computed tomography imaging of the contralateral talus with a stereolithographic model but no data was shown about anatomic talar profiles.
§SooHoo et al.[19]
^Restriction of subtalar joint motion with no goniometer used.
aAngthong et al.[10];Jirarattanaphochai et al.[11]
bNo preoperative AOFAS scores were mentioned.