Fen-Fang Chung1, Hui-Ling Lin2, Hsueh-Erh Liu3, Angela Shin-Yu Lien3, Hsiu-Feng Hsiao4, Lan-Ti Chou5, Gwo-Hwa Wan6. 1. Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology. 2. Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University. 3. School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University. 4. Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China. 5. Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China. 6. Department of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University ghwan@mail.cgu.edu.tw.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The investigation of hospital air quality has been conducted in wards, ICUs, operating theaters, and public areas. Few studies have assessed air quality in respiratory care centers (RCCs), especially in mechanically ventilated patients with open suctioning. METHODS: The RCC air quality indices (temperature, relative humidity, levels of CO2, total volatile organic compounds, particulate matter [PM], bacteria, and fungi) were monitored over 1 y. The air around the patient's head was sampled during open suctioning to examine the probability of bioaerosol exposure affecting health-care workers. RESULTS: This investigation found that the levels of indoor air pollutants (CO2, PM, bacteria, and fungi) were below the indoor air quality standard set by the Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency. Meanwhile, the levels of total volatile organic compounds sometimes exceeded the indoor air quality standard, particularly in August. The identified bacterial genera included Micrococcus species, Corynebacterium species, and Staphylococcus species, and the predominant fungal genera included yeast, Aspergillus species, Scopulariopsis species, and Trichoderma species. Additionally, airborne PM2.5, PM1, and bacteria were clearly raised during open suctioning in mechanically ventilated patients. This phenomenon demonstrated that open suctioning may increase the bacterial exposure risk of health-care workers. CONCLUSIONS: RCC air quality deserves long-term monitoring and evaluation. Health-care workers must implement self-protection strategies during open suctioning to ensure their occupational health and safety in health-care settings.
BACKGROUND: The investigation of hospital air quality has been conducted in wards, ICUs, operating theaters, and public areas. Few studies have assessed air quality in respiratory care centers (RCCs), especially in mechanically ventilated patients with open suctioning. METHODS: The RCC air quality indices (temperature, relative humidity, levels of CO2, total volatile organic compounds, particulate matter [PM], bacteria, and fungi) were monitored over 1 y. The air around the patient's head was sampled during open suctioning to examine the probability of bioaerosol exposure affecting health-care workers. RESULTS: This investigation found that the levels of indoor air pollutants (CO2, PM, bacteria, and fungi) were below the indoor air quality standard set by the Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency. Meanwhile, the levels of total volatile organic compounds sometimes exceeded the indoor air quality standard, particularly in August. The identified bacterial genera included Micrococcus species, Corynebacterium species, and Staphylococcus species, and the predominant fungal genera included yeast, Aspergillus species, Scopulariopsis species, and Trichoderma species. Additionally, airborne PM2.5, PM1, and bacteria were clearly raised during open suctioning in mechanically ventilated patients. This phenomenon demonstrated that open suctioning may increase the bacterial exposure risk of health-care workers. CONCLUSIONS: RCC air quality deserves long-term monitoring and evaluation. Health-care workers must implement self-protection strategies during open suctioning to ensure their occupational health and safety in health-care settings.
Authors: Andrew Thamboo; Jane Lea; Doron D Sommer; Leigh Sowerby; Arman Abdalkhani; Christopher Diamond; Jennifer Ham; Austin Heffernan; M Cai Long; Jobanjit Phulka; Yu Qi Wu; Phillip Yeung; Marc Lammers Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-05-06
Authors: Clyde T Matava; Pete G Kovatsis; Jennifer K Lee; Pilar Castro; Simon Denning; Julie Yu; Raymond Park; Justin L Lockman; Britta Von Ungern-Sternberg; Stefano Sabato; Lisa K Lee; Ihab Ayad; Sam Mireles; David Lardner; Simon Whyte; Judit Szolnoki; Narasimhan Jagannathan; Nicole Thompson; Mary Lyn Stein; Nicholas Dalesio; Robert Greenberg; John McCloskey; James Peyton; Faye Evans; Bishr Haydar; Paul Reynolds; Franklin Chiao; Brad Taicher; Thomas Templeton; Tarun Bhalla; Vidya T Raman; Annery Garcia-Marcinkiewicz; Jorge Gálvez; Jonathan Tan; Mohamed Rehman; Christy Crockett; Patrick Olomu; Peter Szmuk; Chris Glover; Maria Matuszczak; Ignacio Galvez; Agnes Hunyady; David Polaner; Cheryl Gooden; Grace Hsu; Harshad Gumaney; Caroline Pérez-Pradilla; Edgar E Kiss; Mary C Theroux; Jennifer Lau; Saeedah Asaf; Pablo Ingelmo; Thomas Engelhardt; Mónica Hervías; Eric Greenwood; Luv Javia; Nicola Disma; Myron Yaster; John E Fiadjoe Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 5.108