Literature DB >> 25316152

Ensemble learning of inverse probability weights for marginal structural modeling in large observational datasets.

Susan Gruber1, Roger W Logan, Inmaculada Jarrín, Susana Monge, Miguel A Hernán.   

Abstract

Inverse probability weights used to fit marginal structural models are typically estimated using logistic regression. However, a data-adaptive procedure may be able to better exploit information available in measured covariates. By combining predictions from multiple algorithms, ensemble learning offers an alternative to logistic regression modeling to further reduce bias in estimated marginal structural model parameters. We describe the application of two ensemble learning approaches to estimating stabilized weights: super learning (SL), an ensemble machine learning approach that relies on V-fold cross validation, and an ensemble learner (EL) that creates a single partition of the data into training and validation sets. Longitudinal data from two multicenter cohort studies in Spain (CoRIS and CoRIS-MD) were analyzed to estimate the mortality hazard ratio for initiation versus no initiation of combined antiretroviral therapy among HIV positive subjects. Both ensemble approaches produced hazard ratio estimates further away from the null, and with tighter confidence intervals, than logistic regression modeling. Computation time for EL was less than half that of SL. We conclude that ensemble learning using a library of diverse candidate algorithms offers an alternative to parametric modeling of inverse probability weights when fitting marginal structural models. With large datasets, EL provides a rich search over the solution space in less time than SL with comparable results.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data-adaptive; ensemble learning; inverse probability weighting; longitudinal data; marginal structural model; super learning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25316152      PMCID: PMC4262745          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men.

Authors:  M A Hernán; B Brumback; J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational study.

Authors:  A Mocroft; B Ledergerber; C Katlama; O Kirk; P Reiss; A d'Arminio Monforte; B Knysz; M Dietrich; A N Phillips; J D Lundgren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.

Authors:  Daniel F McCaffrey; Greg Ridgeway; Andrew R Morral
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-12

5.  Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; M L Lee; A J Belanger; L A Cupples; K Anderson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  An application of collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation in causal inference and genomics.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.

Authors:  Brian K Lee; Justin Lessler; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Model feedback in Bayesian propensity score estimation.

Authors:  Corwin M Zigler; Krista Watts; Robert W Yeh; Yun Wang; Brent A Coull; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Determinants of survival following HIV-1 seroconversion after the introduction of HAART.

Authors:  Kholoud Porter; Abdel Babiker; Krishnan Bhaskaran; Janet Darbyshire; Patrizio Pezzotti; Kholoud Porter; A Sarah Walker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Super learning to hedge against incorrect inference from arbitrary parametric assumptions in marginal structural modeling.

Authors:  Romain Neugebauer; Bruce Fireman; Jason A Roy; Marsha A Raebel; Gregory A Nichols; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  16 in total

1.  Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Bryan Lau; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  An Illustration of Inverse Probability Weighting to Estimate Policy-Relevant Causal Effects.

Authors:  Jessie K Edwards; Stephen R Cole; Catherine R Lesko; W Christopher Mathews; Richard D Moore; Michael J Mugavero; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Using electronic health records to identify candidates for human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis: An application of super learning to risk prediction when the outcome is rare.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Douglas Krakower; John T Menchaca; Katherine Hsu; Rebecca Hawrusik; Judith C Maro; Noelle M Cocoros; Benjamin A Kruskal; Ira B Wilson; Kenneth H Mayer; Michael Klompas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Risk of liver decompensation with cumulative use of mitochondrial toxic nucleoside analogues in HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfection.

Authors:  Vincent Lo Re; Bret Zeldow; Michael J Kallan; Janet P Tate; Dena M Carbonari; Sean Hennessy; Jay R Kostman; Joseph K Lim; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Robert Gross; Amy C Justice; Jason A Roy
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  A Case Study of the Impact of Data-Adaptive Versus Model-Based Estimation of the Propensity Scores on Causal Inferences from Three Inverse Probability Weighting Estimators.

Authors:  Romain Neugebauer; Julie A Schmittdiel; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Propensity score and doubly robust methods for estimating the effect of treatment on censored cost.

Authors:  Jiaqi Li; Elizabeth Handorf; Justin Bekelman; Nandita Mitra
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A biologist's guide to model selection and causal inference.

Authors:  Zachary M Laubach; Eleanor J Murray; Kim L Hoke; Rebecca J Safran; Wei Perng
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Neural Networks to Estimate Generalized Propensity Scores for Continuous Treatment Doses.

Authors:  Zachary K Collier; Walter L Leite; Allison Karpyn
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2021-03-03

10.  Greenness and Birth Outcomes in a Range of Pennsylvania Communities.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Peter James; Kara E Rudolph; Chih-Da Wu; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.