OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm for coronary CT angiography (cCTA) on the performance of readers with different experience levels. METHODS: We studied 50 patients (18 women, 58 ± 11 years) who had undergone cCTA and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Eight observers with varying experience levels evaluated all studies for ≥50 % coronary artery stenosis. After 3 months, the same observers re-evaluated all studies, this time guided by a CAD system. Their performance with and without the CAD system (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) was assessed using the Likelihood Ratio Χ(2) test both at the per-patient and per-vessel levels. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the CAD system alone for stenosis detection was 71 % per-vessel and 100 % per-patient. There were 54 false positive (FP) findings within 199 analyzed vessels, most of them associated with non-obstructive (<50 %) lesions. With CAD, one (out of three, 33 %) inexperienced reader's per-patient sensitivity and negative predictive value significantly improved from 79 % to 100 % (P = 0.046) and from 90 % to 100 % (P = 0.034), respectively. Other readers' performance indices showed no statistically significant change. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CAD can improve some inexperienced readers' sensitivity for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis at cCTA.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm for coronary CT angiography (cCTA) on the performance of readers with different experience levels. METHODS: We studied 50 patients (18 women, 58 ± 11 years) who had undergone cCTA and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Eight observers with varying experience levels evaluated all studies for ≥50 % coronary artery stenosis. After 3 months, the same observers re-evaluated all studies, this time guided by a CAD system. Their performance with and without the CAD system (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) was assessed using the Likelihood Ratio Χ(2) test both at the per-patient and per-vessel levels. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the CAD system alone for stenosis detection was 71 % per-vessel and 100 % per-patient. There were 54 false positive (FP) findings within 199 analyzed vessels, most of them associated with non-obstructive (<50 %) lesions. With CAD, one (out of three, 33 %) inexperienced reader's per-patient sensitivity and negative predictive value significantly improved from 79 % to 100 % (P = 0.046) and from 90 % to 100 % (P = 0.034), respectively. Other readers' performance indices showed no statistically significant change. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CAD can improve some inexperienced readers' sensitivity for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis at cCTA.
Authors: Stephen Schroeder; Stephan Achenbach; Frank Bengel; Christof Burgstahler; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim de Feyter; Richard George; Philipp Kaufmann; Andreas F Kopp; Juhani Knuuti; Dieter Ropers; Joanne Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Stephan Achenbach; Daniel S Berman; Zahi A Fayad; Michael Poon; Allen J Taylor; Barry F Uretsky; Kim Allan Williams Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mark E Baker; Luca Bogoni; Nancy A Obuchowski; Chandra Dass; Renee M Kendzierski; Erick M Remer; David M Einstein; Pascal Cathier; Anna Jerebko; Sarang Lakare; Andrew Blum; Dina F Caroline; Michael Macari Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Moshrik Abd Alamir; Pamela Noack; Kristine H Jang; Jhanna A Moore; Roman Goldberg; Michael Poon Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Xianjun Han; Nan Luo; Lixue Xu; Jiaxin Cao; Ning Guo; Yi He; Min Hong; Xibin Jia; Zhenchang Wang; Zhenghan Yang Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 1.930