Literature DB >> 25314368

Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes.

Michelle M Duguid1, Melissa C Thomas-Hunt2.   

Abstract

The deleterious effects of stereotyping on individual and group outcomes have prompted a search for solutions. One approach has been to increase awareness of the prevalence of stereotyping in the hope of motivating individuals to resist natural inclinations. However, it could be that this strategy creates a norm for stereotyping, which paradoxically undermines desired effects. The present research demonstrates that individuals who received a high prevalence of stereotyping message expressed more stereotypes than those who received a low prevalence of stereotyping message (Studies 1a, 1b, 1c, and 2) or no message (Study 2). Furthermore, working professionals who received a high prevalence of stereotyping message were less willing to work with an individual who violated stereotypical norms than those who received no message, a low prevalence of stereotyping message, or a high prevalence of counter-stereotyping effort message (Study 3). Also, in a competitive task, individuals who received a high prevalence of stereotyping message treated their opponents in more stereotype-consistent ways than those who received a low prevalence of stereotyping message or those who received a high prevalence of counter-stereotyping effort message (Study 4). PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25314368     DOI: 10.1037/a0037908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  14 in total

1.  Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?

Authors:  Anna Kaatz; You-Geon Lee; Aaron Potvien; Wairimu Magua; Amarette Filut; Anupama Bhattacharya; Renee Leatherberry; Xiaojin Zhu; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Promises and Pitfalls of Diversity Statements: Proceed With Caution.

Authors:  Molly Carnes; Eve Fine; Jennifer Sheridan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Women from some under-represented minorities are given too few talks at world's largest Earth-science conference.

Authors:  Heather L Ford; Cameron Brick; Margarita Azmitia; Karine Blaufuss; Petra Dekens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Cereal Deal: How the Physical Appearance of Others Affects Attention to Healthy Foods.

Authors:  Tobias Otterbring; Kerstin Gidlöf; Kristian Rolschau; Poja Shams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-02-19

5.  Improving Department Climate Through Bias Literacy: One College's Experience.

Authors:  Jennifer Sheridan; Eve Fine; Manuela Romero; Carmen Juniper Neimeko; Molly Carnes; Christine Bell; You-Geon Lee
Journal:  J Women Minor Sci Eng       Date:  2021

6.  Equity, diversity, and inclusion efforts in professional societies: intention versus reaction.

Authors:  Thelma F Madzima; Gustavo C MacIntosh
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 12.085

7.  Engaging Gatekeepers, Optimizing Decision Making, and Mitigating Bias: Design Specifications for Systemic Diversity Interventions.

Authors:  Claartje J Vinkenburg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Sci       Date:  2017-04-07

8.  The mixed effects of online diversity training.

Authors:  Edward H Chang; Katherine L Milkman; Dena M Gromet; Robert W Rebele; Cade Massey; Angela L Duckworth; Adam M Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Assessing gender bias in qualitative evaluations of surgical residents.

Authors:  Katherine M Gerull; Maren Loe; Kristen Seiler; Jared McAllister; Arghavan Salles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports.

Authors:  Peter van den Besselaar; Ulf Sandström; Hélène Schiffbaenker
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.