Philip T Yanos1, Alicia Lucksted2, Amy L Drapalski3, David Roe4, Paul Lysaker5. 1. Psychology Department, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland Medical School. 3. VISN 5 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Maryland Health Care System. 4. Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa. 5. Roudebush VA Medical Center.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: With growing awareness of the impact of mental illness self-stigma, interest has arisen in the development of interventions to combat it. The present article briefly reviews and compares interventions targeting self-stigma to clarify the similarities and important differences between the interventions. METHOD: We conducted a narrative review of published literature on interventions targeting self-stigma. RESULTS: Six intervention approaches (Healthy Self-Concept, Self-Stigma Reduction Program, Ending Self-Stigma, Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy, Coming Out Proud, and Anti-Stigma Photo-Voice Intervention) were identified and are discussed, and data is reviewed on format, group-leader backgrounds, languages, number of sessions, primary mechanisms of action, and the current state of data on their efficacy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We conclude with a discussion of common elements and important distinctions between the interventions and a consideration of which interventions might be best suited to particular populations or settings. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: With growing awareness of the impact of mental illness self-stigma, interest has arisen in the development of interventions to combat it. The present article briefly reviews and compares interventions targeting self-stigma to clarify the similarities and important differences between the interventions. METHOD: We conducted a narrative review of published literature on interventions targeting self-stigma. RESULTS: Six intervention approaches (Healthy Self-Concept, Self-Stigma Reduction Program, Ending Self-Stigma, Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy, Coming Out Proud, and Anti-Stigma Photo-Voice Intervention) were identified and are discussed, and data is reviewed on format, group-leader backgrounds, languages, number of sessions, primary mechanisms of action, and the current state of data on their efficacy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We conclude with a discussion of common elements and important distinctions between the interventions and a consideration of which interventions might be best suited to particular populations or settings. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Zlatka Russinova; E Sally Rogers; Cheryl Gagne; Philippe Bloch; Keith M Drake; Kim T Mueser Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: David Roe; Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon; Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg; Oren Derhy; Paul H Lysaker; Philip T Yanos Journal: J Clin Psychol Date: 2013-10-02
Authors: Patrick W Corrigan; Patrick J Michaels; Karina Powell; Andrea Bink; Lindsay Sheehan; Annie Schmidt; Bethany Apa; Maya Al-Khouja Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Philip T Yanos; Paul H Lysaker; Steven M Silverstein; Beth Vayshenker; Lauren Gonzales; Michelle L West; David Roe Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Lakshmi N Yatham; Sidney H Kennedy; Sagar V Parikh; Ayal Schaffer; David J Bond; Benicio N Frey; Verinder Sharma; Benjamin I Goldstein; Soham Rej; Serge Beaulieu; Martin Alda; Glenda MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Arun Ravindran; Claire O'Donovan; Diane McIntosh; Raymond W Lam; Gustavo Vazquez; Flavio Kapczinski; Roger S McIntyre; Jan Kozicky; Shigenobu Kanba; Beny Lafer; Trisha Suppes; Joseph R Calabrese; Eduard Vieta; Gin Malhi; Robert M Post; Michael Berk Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 6.744