| Literature DB >> 25312986 |
Menachem Hanani1, Erez Blum, Shuangmei Liu, Lichao Peng, Shangdong Liang.
Abstract
Neuropathic pain is a very common complication in diabetes mellitus (DM), and treatment for it is limited. As DM is becoming a global epidemic it is important to understand and treat this problem. The mechanisms of diabetic neuropathic pain are largely obscure. Recent studies have shown that glial cells are important for a variety of neuropathic pain types, and we investigated what are the changes that satellite glial cells (SGCs) in dorsal root ganglia undergo in a DM type 1 model, induced by streptozotocin (STZ) in mice and rats. We carried out immunohistochemical studies to learn about changes in the activation marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in SGCs. We found that after STZ-treatment the number of neurons surrounded with GFAP-positive SGCs in dorsal root ganglia increased 4-fold in mice and 5-fold in rats. Western blotting for GFAP, which was done only on rats because of the larger size of the ganglia, showed an increase of about 2-fold in STZ-treated rats, supporting the immunohistochemical results. These results indicate for the first time that SGCs are activated in rodent models of DM1. As SGC activation appears to contribute to chronic pain, these results suggest that SGCs may participate in the generation and maintenance of diabetic neuropathic pain, and can serve as a potential therapeutic target.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes; glial fibrillary acidic protein; neuropathic pain; satellite glial cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25312986 PMCID: PMC4302642 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Fig. 1Streptozotocin (STZ) injections cause tactile hypersensitivity in mice and rats. Withdrawal responses were measured in the hind paws with von Frey hairs. The pain threshold in 14 days after STZ administration is significantly lower than in control animals, *P < 0.05. The numbers above the bars indicate the number of animals tested.
Fig. 2GFAP was up-regulated in SGCs in mouse DRG 14 days after STZ injection. (A) Control (B) Treated animals. Note that many neurons are surrounded with GFAP-positive SGCs. The two tissues were processed and imaged under the same conditions. Calibration bar, 20 μm. (C) Quantitation of GFAP expression in SGCs in DRG from STZ treated mice. Data for the control group and the STZ treated group were collected from 4 mice each. The asterisk indicates P < 0.05 compared with control, error bars indicate SD.
Fig. 3GFAP was up-regulated in SGCs in rat DRG 14 days after STZ injection. (A) Control (B) Treated animals. Note that many neurons are surrounded with GFAP-positive SGCs. The two tissues were processed and imaged under the same conditions. Calibration bar, 20 μm. (C) Quantitation of GFAP expression in SGCs in DRG from STZ treated rats. Data for the control group and the STZ treated group were collected from 4 rats each. The asterisk indicates P < 0.05 compared with control, error bars indicate SD.
Fig. 4GFAP was up-regulated in rat DRG 14 days after STZ injection, as demonstrated by Western blot study. GFAP protein expression in STZ-treated rats was significantly increased in comparison with that in control rats. N = 6 for each of the groups. The asterisk indicates P < 0.05 compared with control, error bars indicate SD.