Literature DB >> 25312754

[Thulium vapoenucleation of prostates larger than 80 ml using a 1.9-µm and a 2-µm thulium laser. Early perioperative results from two centres].

C Netsch1, T Knoll2, A J Gross3, G Wendt-Nordahl2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) is a size-independent minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement. All ThuVEP series have been performed with a 2-µm thulium laser device so far. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complications and early postoperative results of two thulium-devices with different wavelengths for ThuVEP in prostates larger than 80 ml.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective bi-centric matched-paired analysis with 296 patients was performed. Based on prostate size, 148 were matched at each centre and laser device, respectively. A 2-µm (RevoLix, LISA Laser products, Katlenburg, Germany n=148) and a 1.9-µm (vela XL, starmedtec, Starnberg, Germany, n=148) thulium laser with a power output of 90 and 80 W was used. Patients' data were assessed and compared.
RESULTS: The median prostate volume (interquartile) was 100 ml (range 86.25-120 ml). At discharge, Qmax (preoperative 7.9 and 9 ml/s vs. postoperative 19.35 and 16.2 ml/s) and postvoiding-residual urine (preoperative 130 and 45 ml vs. postoperative 20 and 25 ml) were significantly improved after 2-µm and 1.9-µm ThuVEP (p<0.001). The median catheterization time and hospitalization times were 2 and 4 days in both groups. Perioperative complications occurred in 89 patients (30.1%): Clavien 1 (12.2%), Clavien 2 (9.1%), Clavien 3a (0.7%), Clavien 3b (7.1%), and Clavien 4a (1%). Regarding the occurrence of complications, there were no differences between the two thulium devices.
CONCLUSION: ThuVEP represents a safe and effective treatment for prostates larger than 80 ml. Both thulium laser devices give satisfactory immediate micturition improvement with low perioperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheterization time; Laser therapy; Length of stay; Micturition parameters; Prostate hyperplasia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25312754     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3652-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  22 in total

Review 1.  EAU guidelines on laser technologies.

Authors:  Thomas R W Herrmann; Evangelos N Liatsikos; Udo Nagele; Olivier Traxer; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Thulium:YAG vapoenucleation in large volume prostates.

Authors:  Thorsten Bach; Christopher Netsch; Laura Pohlmann; Thomas R W Herrmann; Andreas J Gross
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) using a mentor-based approach.

Authors:  C Netsch; T Bach; T R W Herrmann; O Neubauer; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Comparison of transurethral enucleation with bipolar and transurethral resection in saline for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Yosuke Hirasawa; Hiroki Ide; Yota Yasumizu; Katsura Hoshino; Yujiro Ito; Takeshi Masuda
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Retropubic transvesical prostatectomy for significant prostatic enlargement must remain a standard part of urology training.

Authors:  Christoph Adam; Alfons Hofstetter; Jörg Deubner; Dirk Zaak; Rolf Weitkunat; Michael Seitz; Peter Schneede
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004

6.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Richard Naspro; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Salonia; Vincenzo Scattoni; Giorgio Guazzoni; Renzo Colombo; Andrea Cestari; Alberto Briganti; Bruno Mazzoccoli; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Change in serum prostate specific antigen concentration after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a marker for completeness of adenoma resection?

Authors:  William W Tinmouth; Enmar Habib; Samuel C Kim; Ramsay L Kuo; Ryan F Paterson; Colin L Terry; Mostafa Elhilali; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients.

Authors:  Rainer M Kuntz; Sascha Ahyai; Karin Lehrich; Amr Fayad
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Influence of prostate size on the outcome of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Hiren S Sodha; Shabbir J Kharodawala; Amit A Khandkar; Sunil S Hegde; Manish B Bansal
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Electrosurgical enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection for prostates larger than 70 ml: a prospective, randomized trial with 5-year followup.

Authors:  Lingfeng Zhu; Shushang Chen; Shunliang Yang; Meijing Wu; Rong Ge; Weizhen Wu; Lianming Liao; Jianming Tan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.