Literature DB >> 23123549

Electrosurgical enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection for prostates larger than 70 ml: a prospective, randomized trial with 5-year followup.

Lingfeng Zhu1, Shushang Chen, Shunliang Yang, Meijing Wu, Rong Ge, Weizhen Wu, Lianming Liao, Jianming Tan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the perioperative and postoperative characteristics of prostate PlasmaKinetic™ enucleation and bipolar transurethral resection for large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial 80 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and a prostate of larger than 70 ml were randomly assigned to prostate bipolar transurethral resection or PlasmaKinetic enucleation. Operative time, resected adenoma weight, changes in hemoglobin, catheterization time and postoperative hospital stay were recorded and compared. Patients were followed 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Greater resected prostate weight (mean ± SD 64.2 ± 19.0 vs 50.6 ± 20.0 gm, p = 0.03), less blood loss (mean 0.87 ± 0.42 vs 1.74 ± 0.63 gm, p <0.01), and shorter catheterization time (mean 35.5 ± 5.8 vs 60.1 ± 5.8 hours, p <0.01) and postoperative hospital stay (mean 3 vs 4 days, [corrected] p <0.01) were recorded in the enucleation group than in the resection group. The postoperative improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, maximal flow rate and post-void residual urine volume was similar in the 2 groups at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months but significantly better in the enucleation group at 36, 48 and 60 months. During the 5-year followup no patient in the enucleation group but 2 in the resection group experienced recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: For large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia PlasmaKinetic enucleation of the prostate is associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay and catheterization time than bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Moreover, PlasmaKinetic enucleation seems to be superior at long-term followup with fewer reoperations necessary.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123549     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  31 in total

1.  Towards optimizing prostate tissue retrieval following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Assessment of two morcellators and review of literature.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elshal; Ramy Mekkawy; Mahmoud Laymon; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed R El-Nahas
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Endoscopic enucleation for prostate larger than 60 mL: comparison between holmium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic enucleation.

Authors:  P- M Patard; M Roumiguie; S Sanson; J- B Beauval; E Huyghe; M Soulié; B Malavaud; X Gamé; P Rischmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Safety and efficiency of thulium laser prostate resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in large prostates.

Authors:  Hai-bin Wei; Jian Zhuo; Xiao-wen Sun; Kun Pang; Yi Shao; Sheng-jie Liang; Di Cui; Fu-jun Zhao; Jun-jie Yu; Shu-jie Xia
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large volume prostates: preliminary 6-month safety and efficacy results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  B Becker; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross; C Netsch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Five-year outcomes of thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction.

Authors:  A J Gross; A K Orywal; B Becker; C Netsch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  HoLEP: the gold standard for the surgical management of BPH in the 21(st) Century.

Authors:  John Michalak; David Tzou; Joel Funk
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2015-04-25

7.  Did prostate size affect the complication and outcome of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate?

Authors:  Jian-Ming Rao; Heng-Jun Xiao; Yi-Xin Ren; Ping Ding; Jiang He; Yong-Li Yan; Jing-Hua Yang; Jin-Rui Yang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Letter to the Editor: A prospective, randomized trial comparing thulium vapoenucleation with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: perioperative safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Christopher Netsch; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) for prostates larger than 85 ml: long-term durability of the procedure.

Authors:  Benedikt Becker; Ann Kathrin Orywal; Andreas J Gross; Christopher Netsch
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  [Thulium vapoenucleation of prostates larger than 80 ml using a 1.9-µm and a 2-µm thulium laser. Early perioperative results from two centres].

Authors:  C Netsch; T Knoll; A J Gross; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.