Literature DB >> 25312639

Offering informed choice about breast screening.

Lindsay J L Forbes1, Amanda-Jane Ramirez2.   

Abstract

Over the last few years, there has been growing international concern about the risk of overdiagnosis in breast screening and about how to communicate this to women. There has also been an increasing policy drive to provide people with information to enable them to make an informed choice about screening. In response to this, a novel approach to developing the information about cancer screening has been adopted in England. This approach has integrated the perspectives of people eligible for screening, and experts in public engagement, informed choice, and communicating risk, as well as experts in screening. New information based on this approach has been provided to women invited for breast screening from September 2013. The new information explicitly sets out the choice to be made, and provides much more detail than previous information about overdiagnosis, the balance of benefits and harms, and the scientific uncertainties. The novel approach has also been adopted to develop new information for the bowel and cervical screening programmes in England, and could provide a model for communicating about cancer screening in other countries.
© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Choice behaviour; Consumer involvement; Health information; Mass screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25312639     DOI: 10.1177/0969141314555350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  17 in total

1.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; Sarina B Schrager; Mary E Hitchcock; Amanda K Kane; Terry A Little; Helene E McDowell; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey.

Authors:  Kenneth D Croes; Nathan R Jones; Lori L DuBenske; Sarina B Schrager; Jane E Mahoney; Terry A Little; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Common methods of measuring 'informed choice' in screening participation: Challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Cristina Renzi; Susanne F Meisel; Jo Waller
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-10-28

5.  Scarce information about breast cancer screening: An Italian websites analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Attena; Mariagrazia Cancellieri; Concetta Paola Pelullo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Comparing perceived clarity of information on overdiagnosis used for breast and prostate cancer screening in England: an experimental survey.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Cristina Renzi; Emily McBride; Jo Waller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience.

Authors:  P Whelehan; A Evans; G Ozakinci
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.520

8.  A cross-sectional survey assessing factors associated with reading cancer screening information: previous screening behaviour, demographics and decision-making style.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Cristina Renzi; Jo Waller
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Extending screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer: do they find it acceptable?

Authors:  Lorna McWilliams; Victoria G Woof; Louise S Donnelly; Anthony Howell; D Gareth Evans; David P French
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Talking about human papillomavirus and cancer: protocol for a patient-centred study to develop scripted consultations.

Authors:  Maggie Hendry; Di Pasterfield; Richard Adams; Mererid Evans; Alison Fiander; Michael Robling; Christine Campbell; Matthew Makin; Simon Gollins; Julia Hiscock; Sadia Nafees; Marie-Jet Bekkers; Jan Rose; Olwen Williams; Margaret Stanley; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.