Literature DB >> 25312499

The influence of forward and backward associative strength on false memories for encoding context.

Jason Arndt1.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effects of forward associative strength (FAS) and backward associative strength (BAS) on false recollection of unstudied lure items. Themes were constructed such that four associates were strongly related to a lure item in terms of FAS or BAS and four associates were weakly related to a lure item in terms of FAS or BAS. Further, when FAS was manipulated, BAS was controlled across strong and weak associates, while FAS was controlled across strong and weak associates when BAS was manipulated. Strong associates were presented in one font while weak associates were presented in a second font. At test, lure items were disproportionately attributed to the source used to present lures' strong associates compared to lures' weak associates, both when BAS was manipulated and when FAS was manipulated. This outcome demonstrates that both BAS and FAS influence lure item false recollection, which favours global-matching models' explanation of false recollection over the explanation offered by spreading activation theories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Context memory; False memory; Global matching; Recollection; Spreading activation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25312499      PMCID: PMC4983188          DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.959527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  21 in total

1.  Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; R Wright; V F Reyna; A H Mojardin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: the role of contextual fan.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Dimitrios K Donavos; Michael A Erickson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

4.  Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Thomas W Hancock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

5.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

6.  Interpolated task effects on direct and mediated false recognition: effects of initial recall, recognition, and the ironic effect of guessing.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Jennifer H Coane; Keith A Hutchison; Elisabeth B Grasser; Jessica E Blais
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Illusory recollection of voices.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Kathleen B McDermott; David B Pisoni; David A Gallo
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-09

8.  Forward association, backward association, and the false-memory illusion.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; Ron Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Developmentally invariant dissociations in children's true and false memories: not all relatedness is created equal.

Authors:  Mark L Howe
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

10.  The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; M K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  The effect of language proficiency and associative strength on false memory.

Authors:  Maria Soledad Beato; Jason Arndt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-02

2.  Closing the door to false memory: the effects of levels-of-processing and stimulus type on the rejection of perceptually vs. semantically dissimilar distractors.

Authors:  Marek Nieznański; Michał Obidziński
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-10

3.  Memory Distortion and Its Avoidance: An Event-Related Potentials Study on False Recognition and Correct Rejection.

Authors:  Sara Cadavid; Maria Soledad Beato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.