Literature DB >> 22642236

Interpolated task effects on direct and mediated false recognition: effects of initial recall, recognition, and the ironic effect of guessing.

Mark J Huff1, Jennifer H Coane, Keith A Hutchison, Elisabeth B Grasser, Jessica E Blais.   

Abstract

In two experiments, participants studied two types of word lists. Direct lists were taken from the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (e.g., water, bridge, run) and contained words directly related to a nonpresented critical item (CI; e.g., river, Roediger & McDermott, 1995). Mediated lists (e.g., faucet, London, jog) contained words related to the CI through a nonpresented mediator. After each study list, participants completed either a recall test, a recall test with a warning about the CI, arithmetic problems, or a recognition test, or they guessed the CI. On a final recognition test, both warning and guessing decreased direct false recognition but increased mediated false recognition, an ironic effect of guessing. An initial recognition test also increased final mediated false recognition. We argue that warning and guessing tasks strengthened associative pathways to the CI, increased the accessibility of associated mediators, and increased monitoring for the CI at test. Increased monitoring was able to reduce CIs from direct, but not mediated, lists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642236     DOI: 10.1037/a0028476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; Dawn M McBride; Miia-Liisa Termonen; J Cooper Cutting
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

2.  The influence of forward and backward associative strength on false memories for encoding context.

Authors:  Jason Arndt
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-10-14

3.  The ironic effect of guessing: increased false memory for mediated lists in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; Mark J Huff; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-09-22

4.  List blocking and longer retention intervals reveal an influence of gist processing for lexically ambiguous critical lures.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Jaimie McNabb; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

5.  The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; David A Balota; Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  All varieties of encoding variability are not created equal: Separating variable processing from variable tasks.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Investigating the interaction of direct and indirect relation on memory judgments and retrieval.

Authors:  Nicholas P Maxwell; Erin M Buchanan
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-10-05

8.  Mixing Languages during Learning? Testing the One Subject-One Language Rule.

Authors:  Eneko Antón; Guillaume Thierry; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Matthew R Gretz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-20

10.  The Trajectory of Targets and Critical Lures in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patricia I Coburn; Kirandeep K Dogra; Iarenjit K Rai; Daniel M Bernstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.