Literature DB >> 25311306

Joint modeling of longitudinal health-related quality of life data and survival.

Divine E Ediebah1, Francisca Galindo-Garre, Bernard M J Uitdehaag, Jolie Ringash, Jaap C Reijneveld, Linda Dirven, Efstathios Zikos, Corneel Coens, Martin J van den Bent, Andrew Bottomley, Martin J B Taphoorn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In cancer research, outcome measures may co-vary. Treatment and treatment related impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may affect survival. When these effects are analyzed separately, bias may arise. Therefore, we investigated the combined effect of treatment and longitudinally measured HRQoL on survival.
METHODS: Patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (n = 288) who were randomized (EORTC 26951) to radiotherapy (RT) alone or RT plus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy were analyzed. HRQoL [appetite loss (AP)] was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30. We compared survival results from different analysis strategies: Cox model with treatment only [model 1 (M1)] or with treatment and time-dependent AP score [model 2 (M2)] and the joint model combining longitudinal AP score and survival [model 3 (M3)].
RESULTS: The estimated hazard ratio (HR) for RT plus PCV was 0.76 (95 % CI 0.58-1.00) for M1, 0.72 (0.55-0.96) for M2, and 0.69 (0.52-0.92) for M3. This corresponds to a lower risk of death of 24 % in M1, 28 % in M2, and 31 % in M3, for patients treated with RT plus PCV chemotherapy. AP resulted in an increased risk of death, with estimated HR of 1.06 (1.01-1.12) for M2 and 1.13 (1.03-1.23) for M3: Every 10-point increase of AP resulted in a 13 % increased risk of death in M3 as compared to 6 % in M2.
CONCLUSION: Part of the survival benefit of treatment with RT plus PCV chemotherapy can be masked by the negative effect that this treatment has on patients' HRQoL. In our study, up to 7 % of the theoretical treatment efficacy was lost when AP was not adjusted through joint modeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25311306     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0821-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  31 in total

1.  A comparison of two methods for the estimation of precision with incomplete longitudinal data, jointly modelled with a time-to-event outcome.

Authors:  G Touloumi; A G Babiker; M G Kenward; S J Pocock; J H Darbyshire
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Joint modeling of survival and longitudinal data: likelihood approach revisited.

Authors:  Fushing Hsieh; Yi-Kuan Tseng; Jane-Ling Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The development and psychometric validation of a brain cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for use in combination with general cancer-specific questionnaires.

Authors:  D Osoba; N K Aaronson; M Muller; K Sneeuw; M A Hsu; W K Yung; M Brada; E Newlands
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Simultaneously modelling censored survival data and repeatedly measured covariates: a Gibbs sampling approach.

Authors:  C L Faucett; D C Thomas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Model-based approaches to analysing incomplete longitudinal and failure time data.

Authors:  J W Hogan; N M Laird
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Basic concepts and methods for joint models of longitudinal and survival data.

Authors:  Joseph G Ibrahim; Haitao Chu; Liddy M Chen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal data and the dropout process in a competing risk setting: application to ICU data.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Deslandes; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials.

Authors:  Chantal Quinten; Corneel Coens; Murielle Mauer; Sylvie Comte; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Charles Cleeland; David Osoba; Kristin Bjordal; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  The challenges and achievements involved in implementing Quality of Life research in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  A Bottomley; V Vanvoorden; H Flechtner; P Therasse
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Joint modelling of bivariate longitudinal data with informative dropout and left-censoring, with application to the evolution of CD4+ cell count and HIV RNA viral load in response to treatment of HIV infection.

Authors:  Rodolphe Thiébaut; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda; Abdel Babiker; Daniel Commenges
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  10 in total

1.  Alive and Ventilator Free: A Hierarchical, Composite Outcome for Clinical Trials in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Victor Novack; Jeremy R Beitler; Maayan Yitshak-Sade; B Taylor Thompson; David A Schoenfeld; Gordon Rubenfeld; Daniel Talmor; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Flexible modeling of longitudinal health-related quality of life data accounting for informative dropout in a cancer clinical trial.

Authors:  Audrey Winter; Benjamin Cuer; Thierry Conroy; Beata Juzyna; Sophie Gourgou; Caroline Mollevi; Célia Touraine
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.440

3.  Psychological Symptom Trajectories and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival: A Joint Model Analysis.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen; Joseph P McElroy; David P Carbone; Carolyn J Presley; Rachel M Smith; Peter G Shields; Guy N Brock
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2022 Feb-Mar 01       Impact factor: 3.864

Review 4.  Opportunities and challenges of incorporating clinical outcome assessments in brain tumor clinical trials.

Authors:  Emanuela Molinari; Tito R Mendoza; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-08-07

5.  Long-term neurocognitive and other side effects of radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, for glioma.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; David Gillespie; Therese Dowswell; Jonathan Evans; Sara Erridge; Luke Vale; Ashleigh Kernohan; Robin Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-05

Review 6.  Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Sudell; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Catrin Tudur-Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  Health-related quality of life of cranial WHO grade I meningioma patients: are current questionnaires relevant?

Authors:  Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Marthe C M Peeters; Daniel J Lobatto; Marieke L D Broekman; Timothy R Smith; Nienke R Biermasz; Saskia M Peerdeman; Wilco C Peul; Martin J B Taphoorn; Wouter R van Furth; Linda Dirven
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 8.  Research Objectives, Statistical Analyses and Interpretation of Health-Related Quality of Life Data in Glioma Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marijke B Coomans; Marthe C M Peeters; Johan A F Koekkoek; Jan W Schoones; Jaap Reijneveld; Martin J B Taphoorn; Linda Dirven
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Calculating the net clinical benefit in neuro-oncology clinical trials using two methods: quality-adjusted survival effect sizes and joint modeling.

Authors:  Marijke B Coomans; Linda Dirven; Neil K Aaronson; Brigitta G Baumert; Martin van den Bent; Andrew Bottomley; Alba A Brandes; Olivier Chinot; Corneel Coens; Thierry Gorlia; Ulrich Herrlinger; Florence Keime-Guibert; Annika Malmström; Francesca Martinelli; Jeff A Sloan; Roger Stupp; Andrea Talacchi; Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick; Jaap C Reijneveld; Martin J B Taphoorn
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-10-29

10.  Factors that affect PERCIST-defined test-retest comparability: an exploration of feasibility in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Daniel King Hung Tong; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.794

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.