Literature DB >> 31386029

Opportunities and challenges of incorporating clinical outcome assessments in brain tumor clinical trials.

Emanuela Molinari1, Tito R Mendoza2, Mark R Gilbert3.   

Abstract

Regulatory agencies have progressively emphasized the importance of assessing broader aspects of patient well-being to better define therapeutic gain. As a result, clinical outcome assessments (COAs) are increasingly used to evaluate the impact, both positive and negative, of cancer treatments and in some instances have played a major factor in the regulatory approval of drugs. Challenges remain, however, in the routine incorporation of these measures in cancer clinical trials, particularly in brain tumor studies. Factors unique to brain tumor patients such as cognitive decline and language dysfunction may hamper their successful implementation. Study designs often relegated these outcome measures to exploratory endpoints, further compromising data completion. New strategies are needed to maximize the complementary information that COAs could add to clinical trials alongside more traditional measures such as progression-free and overall survival. The routine incorporation of COAs as either primary or secondary objectives with attention to minimizing missing data should define a novel clinical trial design. We provide a review of the approaches, challenges, and opportunities for incorporating COAs into brain tumor clinical research, providing a perspective for integrating these measures into clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain tumors; clinical outcome assessment; clinical trials; net clinical benefit; patient-reported outcomes

Year:  2018        PMID: 31386029      PMCID: PMC6656315          DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurooncol Pract        ISSN: 2054-2577


  34 in total

1.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Shaobo Zhang; Kristopher J Preacher; Derek D Rucker
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

2.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben A Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Richard S Levy; Vikas Gupta; John F DiPersio; John V Catalano; Michael Deininger; Carole Miller; Richard T Silver; Moshe Talpaz; Elliott F Winton; Jimmie H Harvey; Murat O Arcasoy; Elizabeth Hexner; Roger M Lyons; Ronald Paquette; Azra Raza; Kris Vaddi; Susan Erickson-Viitanen; Iphigenia L Koumenis; William Sun; Victor Sandor; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Multifaceted end points in brain tumor clinical trials: cognitive deterioration precedes MRI progression.

Authors:  Christina A Meyers; Kenneth R Hess
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  A computer-based procedure for assessing functional cognitive skills in patients with neurological injuries: the virtual street.

Authors:  N Titov; R G Knight
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Patient self-reports of symptoms and clinician ratings as predictors of overall cancer survival.

Authors:  Chantal Quinten; John Maringwa; Carolyn C Gotay; Francesca Martinelli; Corneel Coens; Bryce B Reeve; Henning Flechtner; Eva Greimel; Madeleine King; David Osoba; Charles Cleeland; Jolie Ringash; Joseph Schmucker-Von Koch; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joachim Weis; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Net clinical benefit: functional endpoints in brain tumor clinical trials.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Intra and interobserver variability in cancer patients' performance status assessed according to Karnofsky and ECOG scales.

Authors:  F Roila; M Lupattelli; M Sassi; C Basurto; S Bracarda; M Picciafuoco; E Boschetti; G Milella; E Ballatori; M Tonato
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Delayed emotional recovery after taxane-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lisa M Thornton; William E Carson; Charles L Shapiro; William B Farrar; Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Primary versus recurrent surgery for glioblastoma-a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Maja Chava Rubin; Lisa Millgård Sagberg; Asgeir Store Jakola; Ole Solheim
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Clinical trials targeting neurofibromatoses-associated tumors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriel Roman Souza; Ahmed Abdalla; Daruka Mahadevan
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-01-16

3.  World Cancer Day 2021 - Perspectives in Pediatric and Adult Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Erik P Sulman; David D Eisenstat
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.