Literature DB >> 25311188

Algal cell disruption using microbubbles to localize ultrasonic energy.

Joel D Krehbiel1, Lance C Schideman2, Daniel A King1, Jonathan B Freund3.   

Abstract

Microbubbles were added to an algal solution with the goal of improving cell disruption efficiency and the net energy balance for algal biofuel production. Experimental results showed that disruption increases with increasing peak rarefaction ultrasound pressure over the range studied: 1.90 to 3.07 MPa. Additionally, ultrasound cell disruption increased by up to 58% by adding microbubbles, with peak disruption occurring in the range of 10(8)microbubbles/ml. The localization of energy in space and time provided by the bubbles improve efficiency: energy requirements for such a process were estimated to be one-fourth of the available heat of combustion of algal biomass and one-fifth of currently used cell disruption methods. This increase in energy efficiency could make microbubble enhanced ultrasound viable for bioenergy applications and is expected to integrate well with current cell harvesting methods based upon dissolved air flotation.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algal biofuel; Dissolved air flotation; Microbubble; Specific cell disruption energy; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25311188      PMCID: PMC4412598          DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  7 in total

Review 1.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a review.

Authors:  E Stride; N Saffari
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Evaluation of cell-disruption effects of pulsed-electric-field treatment of Synechocystis PCC 6803.

Authors:  Jie Sheng; Raveender Vannela; Bruce E Rittmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  High-frequency dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Dustin E Kruse; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results.

Authors:  Daniel A King; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Force and energy requirement for microalgal cell disruption: an atomic force microscope evaluation.

Authors:  Andrew K Lee; David M Lewis; Peter J Ashman
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Bacterial viability and antibiotic susceptibility testing with SYTOX green nucleic acid stain.

Authors:  B L Roth; M Poot; S T Yue; P J Millard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of several methods for effective lipid extraction from microalgae.

Authors:  Jae-Yon Lee; Chan Yoo; So-Young Jun; Chi-Yong Ahn; Hee-Mock Oh
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 9.642

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound for microalgal cell disruption and product extraction: A review.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Xin Liu; Yan Cui; Wenqiao Yuan
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.336

2.  Selective flow-induced vesicle rupture to sort by membrane mechanical properties.

Authors:  Angelo Pommella; Nicholas J Brooks; John M Seddon; Valeria Garbin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.