Literature DB >> 25311007

Factors associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

A R Bhama1, M E Charlton, M B Schmitt, J W Cromwell, J C Byrn.   

Abstract

AIM: Conversion rates from laparoscopic to open colectomy and associated factors are traditionally reported in clinical trials or reviews of outcomes from experienced institutions. Indications and selection criteria for laparoscopic colectomy may be more narrowly defined in these circumstances. With the increased adoption of laparoscopy, conversion rates using national data need to be closely examined. The purpose of this study was to use data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) to identify factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open colectomy at a national scale in the United States.
METHOD: The ACS-NSQIP Participant Use Data Files for 2006-2011 were used to identify patients who had undergone laparoscopic colectomy. Converted cases were identified using open colectomy as the primary procedure and laparoscopic colectomy as 'other procedure'. Preoperative variables were identified and statistics were calculated using sas version 9.3. Logistic regression was used to model the multivariate relationship between patient variables and conversion status.
RESULTS: Laparoscopy was successfully performed in 41 585 patients, of whom 2508 (5.8%) required conversion to an open procedure. On univariate analysis the following factors were significant: age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, presence of diabetes, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ascites, stroke, weight loss and chemotherapy (P < 0.05). The following factors remained significant on multivariate analysis: age, BMI, ASA class, smoking, ascites and weight loss.
CONCLUSION: Multiple significant factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy were identified. A novel finding was the increased risk of conversion for underweight patients. As laparoscopic colectomy is become increasingly utilized, factors predictive of conversion to open procedures should be sought via large national cohorts. Colorectal Disease
© 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colectomy; conversion colorectal; laparoscopic; minimally invasive

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25311007      PMCID: PMC4329054          DOI: 10.1111/codi.12800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  40 in total

1.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Nutritional status, nutrition practices and post-operative complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  A K Garth; C M Newsome; N Simmance; T C Crowe
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.089

3.  Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations.

Authors:  S Ambardar; J Cabot; V Cekic; K Baxter; T D Arnell; K A Forde; A Nihalani; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Capretti; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A nationwide analysis of laparoscopy in high-risk colorectal surgery patients.

Authors:  Celeste Y Kang; Wissam J Halabi; Obaid O Chaudhry; Vinh Nguyen; Noor Ketana; Joseph C Carmichael; Alessio Pigazzi; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; Q Hernandez; A Sanchez; M D Frutos; P Parrilla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009.

Authors:  Celeste Y Kang; Obaid O Chaudhry; Wissam J Halabi; Vinh Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mariano Cesare Giglio; Valerio Celentano; Rachele Tarquini; Gaetano Luglio; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy reduces complications and hospital length of stay in colon cancer patients with liver disease and ascites.

Authors:  Kevin Y Pei; David T Asuzu; Kimberly A Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: which factors are related to open conversion? Lessons learned from 68 consecutive procedures in a high-volume pancreatic center.

Authors:  Riccardo Casadei; Claudio Ricci; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Carlo Ingaldi; Giovanni Taffurelli; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Sam C Wang; Matthew R Porembka; Adam C Yopp; Michael A Choti; Mathew M Augustine; Patricio M Polanco; John C Mansour; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Patient, Hospital, and Geographic Disparities in Laparoscopic Surgery Use Among Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Patients With Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Kendra L Ratnapradipa; Min Lian; Donna B Jeffe; Nicholas O Davidson; Jan M Eberth; Sandi L Pruitt; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Reoperative Abdomen or Pelvis.

Authors:  Amanda Feigel; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

8.  Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.

Authors:  Amir L Bastawrous; Ron G Landmann; Yuki Liu; Emelline Liu; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of Risk Factors for Unplanned Conversion from Laparoscopic and Robotic to Open Colorectal Surgery Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) Database.

Authors:  Anuradha R Bhama; Abdullah M Wafa; Jane Ferraro; Stacey D Collins; Andrew J Mullard; James F Vandewarker; Greta Krapohl; John C Byrn; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Preemptive Analgesia on Postoperative Recovery of Patients with Open Radical Colon Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Hongping Hu; Chang Feng; Dongyi Liu; Ning Ding
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.