| Literature DB >> 25309756 |
Saoussen Ben Khedher1, Samir Jaoua2, Nabil Zouari2.
Abstract
The overcoming of catabolite repression, in bioinsecticides production by sporeless Bacillus thuringiensis strain S22 was investigated into fully controlled 3 L fermenter, using glucose based medium. When applying adequate oxygen profile throughout the fermentation period (75% oxygen saturation), it was possible to partially overcome the catabolite repression, normally occurring at high initial glucose concentrations (30 and 40 g/L glucose). Moreover, toxin production yield by sporeless strain S22 was markedly improved by the adoption of the fed-batch intermittent cultures technology. With 22.5 g/L glucose used into culture medium, toxin production was improved by about 36% when applying fed-batch culture compared to one batch. Consequently, the proposed fed-batch strategy was efficient for the overcome of the carbon catabolite repression. So, it was possible to overproduce insecticidal crystal proteins into highly concentrated medium.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25309756 PMCID: PMC4182890 DOI: 10.1155/2014/698587
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Res Int ISSN: 2090-3146
Independent variables and their levels for the 23 factorial experimental designs.
| Factor | Name | Unit | Coded level | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | +1 | |||
|
| Aeration profile | % | 60–40 | 75-75 |
|
| Glucose | g/L | 30 | 40 |
|
| Yeast extract | g/L | 5.8 | 10.31 |
Aeration effect on delta-endotoxin production in glucose based medium.
| Aeration profiles | Total production (mg) | CFU | Toxin synthesis yield (mg/1010 cells)∗∗ | Toxin production yield (mg/g glucose)∗∗∗ | LC50 (ng of toxin per mg of flour) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60–40 | 4338 ± 130.7a* | 18 ± 4.3a | 120.5 | 113.41 | 560.86 ± 8.59bc |
| 70–40 | 3704 ± 90.5b | 15 ± 3a | 120.46 | 96.83 | 574.65 ± 13.06b |
| 60–30 | 4202 ± 146.6a | 20 ± 3.6a | 105.05 | 109.85 | 546.61 ± 15.16c |
| 40-40 | 3064 ± 26.5d | 17 ± 2.6a | 97.41 | 80.1 | 604.09 ± 7.09a |
| 60–50 | 3430 ± 98.2c | 15 ± 2.6a | 114.33 | 89.67 | 592.54 ± 3.29a |
R 2 = 0.97; coefficient of variance = 2.84; [(Pr > F) < 0.001].
∗The letters a, b, c, and d used as indices in the same column indicated the presence of significant differences (Duncan's multiple range test, P < 0.05) among the experiments, in ascending order.
∗∗Relative toxin yield calculated as the ratio of delta-endotoxins (mg/L) over CFU (1010 cells/L) both of them determined at the end of fermentation.
∗∗∗Toxin production yield calculated as the ratio of delta-endotoxin (mg/L) over assimilated glucose (g/L).
Aeration effect on delta-endotoxins production in media based on different concentrations of glucose and yeast extract.
| Aeration profiles | Glucose (mg/L) | Yeast extract (g/L) | Total production (mg) | CFU (107 cells/mL) | Toxin synthesis yield (mg/1010 cells) | Toxin production yield (mg/g glucose) | LC50 (ng of toxin per mg of flour) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60–40 | 30 | 5.8 | 4005 ± 117.37d* | 22 ± 2.82f | 107.08 | 78.52 | 604.8 ± 2.99a |
| 75-75 | 30 | 5.8 | 4871 ± 148.49b | 39 ± 5.65c,d | 73.46 | 95.5 | 574 ± 5.65b,c |
| 60–40 | 40 | 5.8 | 4107 ± 111.72c,d | 26 ± 5.65e,f | 92.91 | 60.39 | 592.11 ± 24.52a,b |
| 75-75 | 40 | 5.8 | 4871.5 ± 149.19b | 44 ± 0b,c,d | 65.12 | 71.63 | 557.88 ± 5.35c |
| 60–40 | 30 | 10.31 | 4382.5 ± 38.89c | 35 ± 1.41d,e | 73.65 | 85.93 | 579.44 ± 4.76a,b,c |
| 75-75 | 30 | 10.31 | 4966 ± 106a,b | 48 ± 2.82b,c | 60.85 | 97.37 | 554.72 ± 0.88c |
| 60–40 | 40 | 10.31 | 4356 ± 31.11c | 51 ± 7.07b | 50.24 | 64.05 | 580 ± 11.31a,b,c |
| 75-75 | 40 | 10.31 | 5195 ± 145.66a | 66 ± 5.65a | 46.3 | 76.39 | 556.39 ± 7.46c |
*The letters a, b, c, d, e, and f used as indices in the same column indicated the presence of significant differences (Duncan's multiple range test, P < 0.05) among the experiments, in ascending order.
ANOVA results for the three factorial designs for delta-endotoxins production.
| Source | Sum of squares | DF | Mean square |
| Pr > |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 2677861 | 8 | 334732.625 | 22.27 | <0.01∗∗∗ |
|
| 2330202.25 | 1 | 2330202.25 | 155.01 | <0.01∗∗∗ |
|
| 23256.25 | 1 | 23256.25 | 1.55 | 0.2536 |
|
| 273006.25 | 1 | 273006.25 | 18.16 | <0.01∗∗∗ |
|
| 5929 | 1 | 5929 | 0.39 | 0.5499 |
|
| 10816 | 1 | 10816 | 0.72 | 0.4244 |
|
| 2500 | 1 | 2500 | 0.17 | 0.6956 |
|
| 31862.25 | 1 | 31862.25 | 2.12 | 0.1888 |
| Pure error | 105230 | 7 | 15032.857 | ||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
***indicates significance at the level 99.9%.
Effect of glucose feeding on production of bioinsecticides into 3 litre fermenter.
| Initial concentration of glucose (g/L) | Total glucose consumption (g/L) | Yeast extract (g/L) | Total production (mg) | CFU (107 cells/mL) | Toxin synthesis yield (mg/1010 cells) | Toxin production yield (mg/g glucose) | LC50 (ng of toxin per mg of flour) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.5∗∗ | 22.5 | 5.8 | 4202 ± 103.5d* | 22 ± 4.5a | 94.54 | 109.85 | 626.87 ± 24.03a |
| 22.5 | 35 | 5.8 | 5712 ± 141.7b | 25 ± 7.9a | 95.2 | 96 | 553.35 ± 11.91c |
| 22.5∗∗∗ | 34.07 | 10 | 5650 ± 70.3b | 26 ± 8.1a | 94.46 | 97.55 | 542.32 ± 9.26c |
| 10 | 18.77 | 5.8 | 3126 ± 16e | 15 ± 5.2a | 94.66 | 97.96 | 561.41 ± 5.69c |
| 15 | 29 | 5.8 | 4831 ± 150c | 22 ± 9.1a | 99.81 | 97.99 | 556.29 ± 14.37c |
| 30 | 30 | 5.8 | 4035 ± 106.8d | 22 ± 11.5a | 83 | 79.11 | 620.37 ± 18.45a |
| 40 | 40 | 5.8 | 4107 ± 81d | 30 ± 6a | 62.23 | 60.39 | 589.85 ± 17.81b |
| 22.5 | 42.5 | 5.8 | 6503 ± 49.1a | 28 ± 7.5a | 96.75 | 90 | 552.61 ± 11.55c |
R 2 = 0.994; coefficient of variance = 2.17; [(Pr > F) < 0.001].
∗The letters a, b, c, d, and e used as indices in the same column indicated the presence of significant differences (Duncan's multiple range test, P < 0.05) among the experiments, in ascending order.
∗∗Batch culture curried out with the mentioned carbon source and yeast extract concentrations.
∗∗∗Fed-batch culture realized with feeding both glucose and yeast extract.