| Literature DB >> 25309613 |
Zipeng Gong1, Ying Chen1, Ruijie Zhang1, Yinghan Wang2, Qing Yang1, Yan Guo1, Xiaogang Weng1, Shuangrong Gao1, Hailin Wang1, Xiaoxin Zhu1, Yu Dong3, Yujie Li1, Yajie Wang1.
Abstract
A comparative pharmacokinetic study of berberine and palmatine after oral administration of Rhizoma Coptidis extract (96 mg/kg, containing berberine 22 mg/kg and palmatine 5 mg/kg based on body weight) was performed in normal and postinflammation irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) rats, induced by intracolonic instillation of acetic acid and restraint stress. Quantification of berberine and palmatine in rat plasma was achieved by using a sensitive and rapid UPLC-MS/MS method. Plasma samples were collected at 13 different time points and the pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by WinNonlin software. The significant differences in the pharmacokinetic behaviors, such as C max, AUC(0-t), V d /F, and CL/F, of berberine and palmatine were found between normal and PI-IBS model rats. The results indicated that PI-IBS pathological conditions in rats could alter the pharmacokinetic behavior of drug. Preclinical pharmacokinetic studies are usually carried out on healthy animals. However, we should pay more attention to the fact that the change of pharmacokinetic behavior plays an important role on efficacy. It is essential to investigate the pharmacokinetics of the drug in disease status.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25309613 PMCID: PMC4163303 DOI: 10.1155/2014/845048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The change of body weight before enema and after stress in rats (mean ± SD, n = 10).
Figure 2The representative curve of colonic movement in the control group (a) and the model group (b) before enema and in the control group (c) and the model group (d) after stress.
Figure 3The distal colonic MI of rats in the control group and the model group (mean ± SD, n = 10). **P < 0.01 compared with normal group.
Figure 4Time of the glass bead output (s) (mean ± SD, n = 10). **P < 0.01 compared with normal group.
Figure 5Number of the fecal pellet outputs in 2 hours (mean ± SD, n = 10). **P < 0.01 compared with normal group.
Figure 6Photomicrographs of distal colons from the control group (A, ×100; B, ×400) and model group (C, ×100; D, ×400) by hematoxylin and eosin staining.
Figure 7Photomicrographs of mast cell in proximal colons from the control group (A, ×100; B, ×400) and the model group (C, ×100; D, ×400) by toluidine blue staining. The red arrows indicated the mast cell.
The number of the mast cells in proximal colon (mean ± SD, n = 5).
| Group | Mast cell count after stress (piece) |
|---|---|
| Control | 3.27 ± 1.05 |
| Model | 6.77 ± 2.73∗ |
*P < 0.05 compared with the control group.
Figure 8The mean plasma concentration (ng/mL) of berberine and palmatine versus time (h) profiles after oral administration of Rhizoma Coptidis extract in the control and PI-IBS model rats. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of berberine and palmatine in rat after oral administration of Rhizoma Coptidis extract at a dose of 96 mg/kg (mean ± SD, n = 5).
| Parameters | Berberine | Palmatine | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Model | Control | Model | |
|
| 945.8 ± 349.5 | 836.2 ± 253.3 | 1611.7 ± 616.0 | 1521.7 ± 710.9 |
|
| 15.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 0.0 |
|
| 20.0 ± 12.1 | 39.2 ± 7.9∗∗ | 8.1 ± 2.2 | 9.1 ± 1.2 |
| AUC0–t (min | 4954.3 ± 784.3 | 9874.7 ± 2713.1∗∗ | 1470.6 ± 229.8 | 2186.6 ± 693.4∗ |
|
| 5124.3 ± 1841.2 | 2503.9 ± 542.4∗∗ | 4869.6 ± 1237.6 | 4315.9 ± 1111.3 |
|
CL/ | 198.6 ± 75.4 | 124.3 ± 27.4∗ | 147.4 ± 45.3 | 119.3 ± 28.1 |
**P < 0.01 and ∗P < 0.05 compared with the control group.