Tomas Cajka1, Oliver Fiehn1. 1. UC Davis Genome Center-Metabolomics, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Abstract
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based lipidomics has been a subject of dramatic developments over the past decade. This review focuses on state of the art in LC-MS-based lipidomics, covering all the steps of global lipidomic profiling. On the basis of review of 185 original papers and application notes, we can conclude that typical LC-MS-based lipidomics methods involve: (1) extraction using chloroform/MeOH or MTBE/MeOH protocols, both with addition of internal standards covering each lipid class; (2) separation of lipids using short microbore columns with sub-2-μm or 2.6-2.8-μm (fused-core) particle size with C18 or C8 sorbent with analysis time <30 min; (3) electrospray ionization in positive- and negative-ion modes with full spectra acquisition using high-resolution MS with capability to MS/MS. Phospholipids (phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylinositols, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylglycerols) followed by sphingomyelins, di- and tri-acylglycerols, and ceramides were the most frequently targeted lipid species.
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based nclass="Chemical">lipidomics has been a subject of dramatic developments over the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">past decade. This review focuses on state of the art in LC-MS-based lipidomics, covering all the steps of global lipidomic profiling. On the basis of review of 185 original papers and application notes, we can conclude that typical LC-MS-based lipidomics methods involve: (1) extraction using chloroform/MeOH or MTBE/MeOH protocols, both with addition of internal standards covering each lipid class; (2) separation of lipids using short microbore columns with sub-2-μm or 2.6-2.8-μm (fused-core) particle size with C18 or C8 sorbent with analysis time <30 min; (3) electrospray ionization in positive- and negative-ion modes with full spectra acquisition using high-resolution MS with capability to MS/MS. Phospholipids (phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylinositols, phosphatidylserines, phosphatidylglycerols) followed by sphingomyelins, di- and tri-acylglycerols, and ceramides were the most frequently targeted lipid species.
Authors: Chao Zhu; Adrie Dane; Gerwin Spijksma; Mei Wang; Jan van der Greef; Guoan Luo; Thomas Hankemeier; Rob J Vreeken Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 4.759
Authors: Susan S Bird; Vasant R Marur; Matthew J Sniatynski; Heather K Greenberg; Bruce S Kristal Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Jose M Castro-Perez; Jurre Kamphorst; Jeroen DeGroot; Floris Lafeber; Jeff Goshawk; Kate Yu; John P Shockcor; Rob J Vreeken; Thomas Hankemeier Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Peter J Meikle; Gerard Wong; Despina Tsorotes; Christopher K Barlow; Jacquelyn M Weir; Michael J Christopher; Gemma L MacIntosh; Benjamin Goudey; Linda Stern; Adam Kowalczyk; Izhak Haviv; Anthony J White; Anthony M Dart; Stephen J Duffy; Garry L Jennings; Bronwyn A Kingwell Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Colin S McCoin; Brian D Piccolo; Trina A Knotts; Dietrich Matern; Jerry Vockley; Melanie B Gillingham; Sean H Adams Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 4.982
Authors: John A Bowden; Candice Z Ulmer; Christina M Jones; Jeremy P Koelmel; Richard A Yost Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Cyrus E Kuschner; Jaewoo Choi; Tai Yin; Koichiro Shinozaki; Lance B Becker; Joshua W Lampe; Junhwan Kim Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Tobias Kind; Hiroshi Tsugawa; Tomas Cajka; Yan Ma; Zijuan Lai; Sajjan S Mehta; Gert Wohlgemuth; Dinesh Kumar Barupal; Megan R Showalter; Masanori Arita; Oliver Fiehn Journal: Mass Spectrom Rev Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 10.946