Literature DB >> 25308970

The natural history and predictors of outcome following biochemical relapse in the dose escalation era for prostate cancer patients undergoing definitive external beam radiotherapy.

Zachary S Zumsteg1, Daniel E Spratt1, Paul B Romesser1, Xin Pei1, Zhigang Zhang2, William Polkinghorn1, Sean McBride1, Marisa Kollmeier1, Yoshiya Yamada1, Michael J Zelefsky3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of biochemical failure (BF) following external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer is controversial, due to both the heterogeneous disease course following a BF and a lack of clinical trials in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the natural history and predictors of outcome for patients experiencing BF in a large cohort of men with localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive dose-escalated EBRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective analysis included 2694 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT at a large academic center. Of these, 609 experienced BF, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir + 2 ng/ml. The median follow-up was 83 mo for all patients and 122 mo for BF patients. INTERVENTION(S): All patients received EBRT at doses of 75.6-86.4 Gy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary objective of this study was to determine predictors of distant progression at the time of BF. Cox proportional hazards models were used in univariate and multivariate analyses of distant metastases (DM), and a competing risks method was used to analyze prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From the date of BF, the median times to DM and PCSM mortality were 5.4 yr and 10.5 yr, respectively. Shorter posttreatment PSA doubling time, a higher initial clinical tumor stage, a higher pretreatment Gleason score, and a shorter interval from the end of radiotherapy to BF were independent predictors for clinical progression following BF. Patients with two of these risk factors had a significantly higher incidence of DM and PCSM following BF than those with zero or one risk factor. The main limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and heterogeneous salvage interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and pathologic factors can help identify patients at high risk of clinical progression following BF. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In this report, we look at predictors of outcome for patients with prostate cancer recurrence, as determined by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, following radiation treatment. We found that the approximate median times to distant metastasis and death from prostate cancer for patients in this situation were 5 yr and 10 yr, respectively. Furthermore, we found that patients with a rapid increase in PSA levels following treatment, a short time to PSA recurrence, invasion of extraprostatic organs, or a high Gleason score had worse outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical failure; External beam radiotherapy; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25308970      PMCID: PMC5002994          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  28 in total

1.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.

Authors:  James Mohler; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Daniel George; Eric Mark Horwitz; Robert P Huben; Philip Kantoff; Mark Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Paul H Lange; Gary Macvicar; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Bruce J Roth; Dennis C Shrieve; Matthew R Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol DeSantis; Katherine Virgo; Kevin Stein; Angela Mariotto; Tenbroeck Smith; Dexter Cooper; Ted Gansler; Catherine Lerro; Stacey Fedewa; Chunchieh Lin; Corinne Leach; Rachel Spillers Cannady; Hyunsoon Cho; Steve Scoppa; Mark Hachey; Rebecca Kirch; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors.

Authors:  D G Altman; B Lausen; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Validating the interval to biochemical failure for the identification of potentially lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark K Buyyounouski; Tom Pickles; Larry L Kestin; Roger Allison; Scott G Williams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Increasing prostate-specific antigen profile following definitive radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: clinical observations.

Authors:  W R Lee; G E Hanks; A Hanlon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Predictors of metastatic disease in men with biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Onisuru T Okotie; William J Aronson; Jeff A Wieder; Yen Liao; Fred Dorey; Jean B DeKERNION; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Management of biochemical recurrence after primary treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sanoj Punnen; Matthew R Cooperberg; Anthony V D'Amico; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Judd W Moul; Howard I Scher; Thorsten Schlomm; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer: Testosterone therapy for hypogonadal men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Salvatore P Catarinicchia; E David Crawford
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Prostate cancer: predicting outcomes of recurrence after escalated-dose radiotherapy.

Authors:  Robert Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Favorable long-term toxicity for salvage low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy from a phase II prospective trial (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0526).

Authors:  Randall J Brenneman; Edward Soffen; Hiram A Gay; Peter F Orio; John P Christodouleas; John C Baumann; Brian C Baumann
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

Review 4.  Prostate MR Imaging for Posttreatment Evaluation and Recurrence.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 5.  PET imaging of recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer with novel tracers.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Liza Lindenberg; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Testosterone Therapy in Patients with Treated and Untreated Prostate Cancer: Impact on Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Ryan Flannigan; Colin Lundeen; James G Huang; Peter Pommerville; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Men's health supplement use and outcomes in men receiving definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Thomas M Churilla; Karen Ruth; Shelly B Hayes; Mark L Sobczak; Mark A Hallman; Marc C Smaldone; David Yt Chen; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Mechanistic modelling of prostate-specific antigen dynamics shows potential for personalized prediction of radiation therapy outcome.

Authors:  Guillermo Lorenzo; Víctor M Pérez-García; Alfonso Mariño; Luis A Pérez-Romasanta; Alessandro Reali; Hector Gomez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology clinical guidelines for stereotactic body radiation therapy in lymph node oligometastases.

Authors:  A J Conde-Moreno; J L Lopez-Guerra; V A Macias; M L Vázquez de la Torre; P Samper Ots; S San José-Maderuelo; J Pastor Peidro; J López-Torrecilla; J Expósito-Hernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Matthew D Greer; Sam Borofsky; Ismail M Kabakus; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.