| Literature DB >> 25308902 |
Amin Bigham-Sadegh1, Iraj Karimi, Mohamad Shadkhast, Mohamad-Hosein Mahdavi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA), beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and their composite are promising biomaterials, specifically in the orthopedic and dental fields, as their chemical composition is similar to that of bone. Due to the need for safer bone graft applications, these bone graft substitutes are gradually gaining increased acceptability. To stimulate the process of bone healing, several methods have been used previously, including ultrasound, electrical stimulation, exposure to electromagnetic fields, bone grafts, interporous hydroxyapatite (as a bone graft substitute) and bone growth factors. The following study was designed to evaluate the effects of the concurrent usage of hydroxyapatite with demineralized calf fetal growth plate (DCFGP) on the bone healing process.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25308902 PMCID: PMC4441635 DOI: 10.1007/s10195-014-0323-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Traumatol ISSN: 1590-9921
Modified Lane and Sandhu radiological scoring system
| Bone formation | |
| No evidence of bone formation | 0 |
| Bone formation occupying 25 % of the defect | 1 |
| Bone formation occupying 50 % of the defect | 2 |
| Bone formation occupying 75 % of the defect | 3 |
| Bone formation occupying 100 % of the defect | 4 |
| Union (proximal and distal evaluated separately) | |
| No union | 0 |
| Possible union | 1 |
| Radiographic union | 2 |
| Remodeling | |
| No evidence of remodeling | 0 |
| Remodeling of medullary canal | 1 |
| Full remodeling of cortex | 2 |
| Total points possible per category | |
| Bone formation | 4 |
| Proximal union | 2 |
| Distal union | 2 |
| Remodeling | 2 |
| Maximum score | 10 |
Fig. 1Radiographs at 2nd week: A1 hydroxyapatite group, A2 hydroxyapatite–DCFGP group and A3 DCFGP group
Fig. 2Radiographs at 4th week, B1 hydroxyapatite group, B2 hydroxyapatite–DCFGP group and B3 DCFGP group
Fig. 3Radiographs at 6th week, C1 hydroxyapatite group, C2 hydroxyapatite–DCFGP group and C3 DCFGP group
Fig. 4Radiographs at 8th week, D1 hydroxyapatite group, D2 hydroxyapatite–DCFGP group and D3 DCFGP group
Radiographical findings for healing of the bone defect (sum of the radiological scores) at various post-operative intervals
| Postoperative weeks | Median (min–max) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyapatite group ( | Hydroxyapatite–DCFGP group ( | DCFGP group ( | ||
| 2 | 1 (0–3) | 3 (1–4) | 1 (0–3) | 0.08 |
| 4 | 4 (3–8) | 7 (4–10) | 5 (3–6) | 0.1 |
| 6 | 5 (2–8) | 8 (6–10) | 5 (4–7) | 0.07 |
| 8 | 6 (4–9) | 9 (8–10)b | 5 (4–7) |
|
Significant P values are shown in bold face
aKruskal–Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance
bCompared with hydroxyapatite group (p = 0.02) and DCFGP group (p = 0.008) by Mann–Whitney U test. Hydroxyapatite–DCFGP group was significantly (p < 0.05) superior to hydroxyapatite and DCFGP groups
Bone measurements at macroscopic and microscopic level
| Bone type evaluation | Median (min–max) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyapatite group ( | Hydroxyapatite–DCFGP group ( | DCFGP group ( | ||
| Macroscopic uniona | 3 (2–2) | 3 (2–3) | 2 (2–2) | 0.1 |
| Microscopic evaluationb | 6 (4–7) | 7 (5–7) | 5 (4–7) | 0.1 |
aComplete union (+3 score), presence of cartilage, soft tissue or cracks within the defect indicating a possible unstable union (+ 1 or +2 score), complete instability at the defect site indicating nonunion (0 score)
bEmpty (0 score), fibrous tissue only (1 score), more fibrous tissue than fibrocartilage (2 score), more fibrocartilage than fibrous tissue (3 score), fibrocartilage only (4 score), more fibrocartilage than bone (5 score), more bone than fibrocartilage (6 score) and bone only (7 score)
Fig. 5Micrographs of the injured bones after 8 weeks. Regenerated bone with typical structure of trabecular bone is seen in the defect in the hydroxyapatite group (a, ×10), hydroxyapatite–DCFGP group (b, ×10) and DCFGP group (c, ×10) (hematoxylin and eosin staining)