Literature DB >> 21683796

Direct delayed human adenoviral BMP-2 or BMP-6 gene therapy for bone and cartilage regeneration in a pony osteochondral model.

M I Menendez1, D J Clark, M Carlton, D C Flanigan, G Jia, S Sammet, S E Weisbrode, M V Knopp, A L Bertone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate healing of surgically created large osteochondral defects in a weight-bearing femoral condyle in response to delayed percutaneous direct injection of adenoviral (Ad) vectors containing coding regions for either human bone morphogenetic proteins 2 (BMP-2) or -6.
METHODS: Four 13mm diameter and 7mm depth circular osteochondral defects were drilled, 1/femoral condyle (n=20 defects in five ponies). At 2 weeks, Ad-BMP-2, Ad-BMP-6, Ad-green fluorescent protein (GFP), or saline was percutaneously injected into the central drill hole of the defect. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) and computed tomography (CT) were serially performed at 12, 24, and 52 weeks. At 12 (one pony) or 52 weeks, histomorphometry and microtomographic analyses were performed to assess subchondral bone and cartilage repair tissue quality.
RESULTS: Direct delivery of Ad-BMP-6 demonstrated delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and histologic evidence of greater Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in repair tissue at 12 weeks, while Ad-BMP-2 had greater non-mineral cartilage at the surface at 52 weeks (p<0.04). Ad-BMP-2 demonstrated greater CT subchondral bone mineral density (BMD) by 12 weeks and both Ad-BMP-2 and -6 had greater subchondral BMD at 52 weeks (p<0.05). Despite earlier (Ad-BMP-6) and more persistent (Ad-BMP-2) chondral tissue and greater subchondral bone density (Ad-BMP-2 and -6), the tissue within the large weight-bearing defects at 52 weeks was suboptimal in all groups due to poor quality repair cartilage, central fibrocartilage retention, and central bone cavitation. Delivery of either BMP by this method had greater frequency of subchondral bone cystic formation (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of Ad-BMP-2 or Ad-BMP-6 via direct injection supported cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration but was insufficient to provide long-term quality osteochondral repair. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21683796     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  16 in total

Review 1.  Gene therapy approaches to regenerating bone.

Authors:  Nadav Kimelman Bleich; Ilan Kallai; Jay R Lieberman; Edward M Schwarz; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Controlled release strategies for bone, cartilage, and osteochondral engineering--Part II: challenges on the evolution from single to multiple bioactive factor delivery.

Authors:  Vítor E Santo; Manuela E Gomes; João F Mano; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Use of tissue engineering strategies to repair joint tissues in osteoarthritis: viral gene transfer approaches.

Authors:  Magali Cucchiarini; Henning Madry
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Direct rAAV SOX9 administration for durable articular cartilage repair with delayed terminal differentiation and hypertrophy in vivo.

Authors:  Magali Cucchiarini; Patrick Orth; Henning Madry
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Dual delivery of rhPDGF-BB and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells expressing the BMP2 gene enhance bone formation in a critical-sized defect model.

Authors:  Shin-Young Park; Kyoung-Hwa Kim; Seung-Yun Shin; Ki-Tae Koo; Yong-Moo Lee; Yang-Jo Seol
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Delivery of PDGF-B and BMP-7 by mesoporous bioglass/silk fibrin scaffolds for the repair of osteoporotic defects.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhang; Ning Cheng; Richard Miron; Bin Shi; Xiangrong Cheng
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Gene therapy approaches to regenerating the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Christopher H Evans; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 8.  Gene therapy for chondral and osteochondral regeneration: is the future now?

Authors:  Daniele Bellavia; F Veronesi; V Carina; V Costa; L Raimondi; A De Luca; R Alessandro; M Fini; G Giavaresi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Using genes to facilitate the endogenous repair and regeneration of orthopaedic tissues.

Authors:  Christopher Evans
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Accelerated Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Perivascular Stem Cells with NELL-1.

Authors:  Chen-Shuang Li; Xinli Zhang; Bruno Péault; Jie Jiang; Kang Ting; Chia Soo; Yan-Heng Zhou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.