Literature DB >> 25308855

Can we identify changes in fascial paravaginal supports after childbirth?

Jordi Cassadó-Garriga1, Vivien Wong, Kalai Shek, Hans Peter Dietz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Defects of anterior vaginal wall fascia are generally assumed to be factors in the aetiology of cystocele. However, to date, there is very little information on diagnosis by imaging. AIM: To document the appearance of vaginal fornices before and after childbirth using 4D ultrasound volume data sets as an aid in diagnosing paravaginal defects of the anterior vaginal wall.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed by re-analysing data sets obtained in a previously published study involving ante- and postpartum pelvic floor assessment by ultrasound. Two hundred and two nulliparous women had been seen at a mean gestation of 37.2 weeks at two tertiary hospitals. One hundred and sixty-three returned 3 months postpartum. All the participants underwent an interview and 4D translabial ultrasound at both antepartum and postpartum appointments. The integrity of vaginal fornices and levator ani was assessed by tomographic ultrasound.
RESULTS: Vaginal fornices were assessed in both ante- and postnatal volumes, and loss of forniceal tenting was found in 85 patients (52%). On average, seven slices were affected (range, 1-16). On multivariate analysis, controlling for potential confounders, including partial/complete avulsion, loss of forniceal tenting remained independently associated with increased cystocele descent (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal childbirth is associated with loss of tenting of the vaginal fornices, independent of levator trauma, and also with impaired anterior vaginal wall support. This evidence suggests the existence of paravaginal defects and may imply a role for such defects in the causation of anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
© 2014 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth trauma; fascial supports; paravaginal defect; pelvic floor; pelvic organ prolapse

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25308855     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  5 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of paravaginal defect repair with and without apical suspension: a 6-month postoperative follow-up with MRI, clinical examination, and questionnaires.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Susanne Greisen; Karl M Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Assessment of female pelvic floor support to the urethra using 3D transperineal ultrasound.

Authors:  Wen Shui; Yijia Luo; Tao Ying; Qin Li; Chaoran Dou; Minzhi Zhou
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging.

Authors:  Louise T S Arenholt; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen; Karin Glavind; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Impact of subsequent pregnancies on pelvic floor functional anatomy.

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz; Francesco Scoti; Nishamini Subramaniam; Talia Friedman; Ka Lai Shek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  The Epidemiology of Pelvic Floor Disorders and Childbirth: An Update.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hallock; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.844

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.