Literature DB >> 25308097

Simulating the effect of input errors on the accuracy of Tofts' pharmacokinetic model parameters.

Cristina Lavini1.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic modeling in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI is an elegant and useful method that provides valuable insight into angiogenesis in cancer and inflammatory diseases. Despite its widespread use, the reliability of the model results is still questioned, as many factors hamper the calculation of the model's parameters, resulting in the poor reproducibility and accuracy of the method. Pharmacokinetic modeling relies on the knowledge of inputs such as the Arterial Input Function (AIF) and of the tissue contrast agent concentration, both of which are difficult to accurately measure. Any errors in the measurement of either of the inputs propagate into the calculated pharmacokinetic model parameters (PMPs), and the significance of the effect depends on the source of the measurement error. In this work we systematically investigate the effect of the incorrect estimation of the parameters describing the inputs of the model on the calculated PMPs when using Tofts' model. Furthermore, we analyze the dependence of these errors on the native values of the PMPs. We show that errors on the measurement of the native T1 as well as errors on the parameters describing the initial peak of the AIF have the largest impact on the calculated PMPs. The parameter whose error has the least effect is the one describing the slow decay of the AIF. The effect of input parameter (IP) errors on the calculated PMPs is found to be dependent on the native set of PMPs: this is particularly true for the errors in the flip angle, and for the errors in parameters describing the initial AIF peak. Conversely the effect of T1 and AIF scaling errors on the calculated PMPs is only slightly dependent on the native PMPs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE-MRI; Pharmacokinetic modeling; Simulations; Tofts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25308097     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.

Authors:  Marios Spanakis; Eleftherios Kontopodis; Sophie Van Cauter; Vangelis Sakkalis; Kostas Marias
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Maximum Entropy Technique and Regularization Functional for Determining the Pharmacokinetic Parameters in DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Zahra Amini Farsani; Volker J Schmid
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.903

3.  Surrogate vascular input function measurements from the superior sagittal sinus are repeatable and provide tissue-validated kinetic parameters in brain DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Daniel Lewis; Xiaoping Zhu; David J Coope; Sha Zhao; Andrew T King; Timothy Cootes; Alan Jackson; Ka-Loh Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Efficient DCE-MRI Parameter and Uncertainty Estimation Using a Neural Network.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; Jay Acharya; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Pseudo Test-Retest Evaluation of Millimeter-Resolution Whole-Brain Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients with High-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; R Marc Lebel; Jay Acharya; Richard Frayne; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 29.146

6.  Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Edzo M E Klawer; Petra J van Houdt; Frank F J Simonis; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Floris J Pos; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Sofie Isebaert; Karin Haustermans; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Modified Maximum Entropy Method and Estimating the AIF via DCE-MRI Data Analysis.

Authors:  Zahra Amini Farsani; Volker J Schmid
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  Reproducibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Analysis on Intra- and Interobserver and Scan-Rescan Performance of Pharmacokinetic Parameters.

Authors:  Haiyi Wang; Zihua Su; Huiyi Ye; Xiao Xu; Zhipeng Sun; Lu Li; Feixue Duan; Yuanyuan Song; Tryphon Lambrou; Lin Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  18F-FDG PET and DCE kinetic modeling and their correlations in primary NSCLC: first voxel-wise correlative analysis of human simultaneous [18F]FDG PET-MRI data.

Authors:  Florent L Besson; Brice Fernandez; Sylvain Faure; Olaf Mercier; Andrei Seferian; Xavier Mignard; Sacha Mussot; Cecile le Pechoux; Caroline Caramella; Angela Botticella; Antonin Levy; Florence Parent; Sophie Bulifon; David Montani; Delphine Mitilian; Elie Fadel; David Planchard; Benjamin Besse; Maria-Rosa Ghigna-Bellinzoni; Claude Comtat; Vincent Lebon; Emmanuel Durand
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.138

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.