Literature DB >> 25305689

A smart device inertial-sensing method for gait analysis.

Dax Steins1, Ian Sheret2, Helen Dawes3, Patrick Esser4, Johnny Collett5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish and cross-validate a method for analyzing gait patterns determined by the center of mass (COM) through inertial sensors embedded in smart devices. The method employed an extended Kalman filter in conjunction with a quaternion rotation matrix approach to transform accelerations from the object onto the global frame. Derived by double integration, peak-to-trough changes in vertical COM position captured by a motion capture system, inertial measurement unit, and smart device were compared in terms of averaged and individual steps. The inter-rater reliability and levels of agreement for systems were discerned through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. ICCs corresponding to inter-rater reliability were good-to-excellent for position data (ICCs,.80-.95) and acceleration data (ICCs,.54-.81). Levels of agreements were moderate for position data (LOA, 3.1-19.3%) and poor for acceleration data (LOA, 6.8%-17.8%). The Bland-Altman plots, however, revealed a small systematic error, in which peak-to-trough changes in vertical COM position were underestimated by 2.2mm; the Kalman filter׳s accuracy requires further investigation to minimize this oversight. More importantly, however, the study׳s preliminary results indicate that the smart device allows for reliable COM measurements, opening up a cost-effective, user-friendly, and popular solution for remotely monitoring movement. The long-term impact of the smart device method on patient rehabilitation and therapy cannot be underestimated: not only could healthcare expenditures be curbed (smart devices being more affordable than today's motion sensors), but a more refined grasp of individual functioning, activity, and participation within everyday life could be attained.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Gait analysis; Inertial measurement unit; Kalman filter; Smartphones; mHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25305689     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  Disrupting the world of Disability: The Next Generation of Assistive Technologies and Rehabilitation Practices.

Authors:  Catherine Holloway; Helen Dawes
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2016-12-07

2.  Estimation of 3D Body Center of Mass Acceleration and Instantaneous Velocity from a Wearable Inertial Sensor Network in Transfemoral Amputee Gait: A Case Study.

Authors:  Emeline Simonetti; Elena Bergamini; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Joseph Bascou; Hélène Pillet
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Immediate Effect of Restricted Knee Extension on Ground Reaction Force and Trunk Acceleration during Walking.

Authors:  Hiroshi Osaka; Daisuke Fujita; Kenichi Kobara; Tadanobu Suehiro
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2021-07-08

Review 4.  Quantitative Analysis of Motor Status in Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Devices: From Methodological Considerations to Problems in Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Masahiko Suzuki; Hiroshi Mitoma; Mitsuru Yoneyama
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2017-05-18

5.  Single Sensor Gait Analysis to Detect Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Proof of Principle Study.

Authors:  Patrick Esser; Johnny Collett; Kevin Maynard; Dax Steins; Angela Hillier; Jodie Buckingham; Garry D Tan; Laurie King; Helen Dawes
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.376

6.  Association between gait and cognition in an elderly population based sample.

Authors:  Vyara Valkanova; Patrick Esser; Naiara Demnitz; Claire E Sexton; Enikő Zsoldos; Abda Mahmood; Ludovica Griffanti; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux; Helen Dawes; Klaus P Ebmeier
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  System Comparison for Gait and Balance Monitoring Used for the Evaluation of a Home-Based Training.

Authors:  Clara Rentz; Mehran Sahandi Far; Maik Boltes; Alfons Schnitzler; Katrin Amunts; Juergen Dukart; Martina Minnerop
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 8.  Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dylan Kobsar; Jesse M Charlton; Calvin T F Tse; Jean-Francois Esculier; Angelo Graffos; Natasha M Krowchuk; Daniel Thatcher; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Age-Related Changes in Mobility Evaluated by the Timed Up and Go Test Instrumented through a Single Sensor.

Authors:  Giulia R A Mangano; Maria S Valle; Antonino Casabona; Alessandro Vagnini; Matteo Cioni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Ambulatory Assessment of the Dynamic Margin of Stability Using an Inertial Sensor Network.

Authors:  Michelangelo Guaitolini; Federica Aprigliano; Andrea Mannini; Silvestro Micera; Vito Monaco; Angelo Maria Sabatini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.