Literature DB >> 25304777

Tabhu: tools for antibody humanization.

Pier Paolo Olimpieri1, Paolo Marcatili1, Anna Tramontano2.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Antibodies are rapidly becoming essential tools in the clinical practice, given their ability to recognize their cognate antigens with high specificity and affinity, and a high yield at reasonable costs in model animals. Unfortunately, when administered to human patients, xenogeneic antibodies can elicit unwanted and dangerous immunogenic responses. Antibody humanization methods are designed to produce molecules with a better safety profile still maintaining their ability to bind the antigen. This can be accomplished by grafting the non-human regions determining the antigen specificity into a suitable human template. Unfortunately, this procedure may results in a partial or complete loss of affinity of the grafted molecule that can be restored by back-mutating some of the residues of human origin to the corresponding murine ones. This trial-and-error procedure is hard and involves expensive and time-consuming experiments. Here we present tools for antibody humanization (Tabhu) a web server for antibody humanization. Tabhu includes tools for human template selection, grafting, back-mutation evaluation, antibody modelling and structural analysis, helping the user in all the critical steps of the humanization experiment protocol. AVAILABILITY: http://www.biocomputing.it/tabhu CONTACT: anna.tramontano@uniroma1.it, pierpaolo.olimpieri@uniroma1.it SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25304777      PMCID: PMC4308665          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are an important class of therapeutic molecules. The high specificity and affinity towards their respective antigens, their modular structure that facilitates their engineering and the relative low costs for their production in model animals makes them excellent drug candidates against several diseases (Chames ; Reichert, 2012). However, together with all these desirable characteristics, xenogeneic mAbs have drawbacks that limit their therapeutic benefits and can ultimately endanger the patients’ health (Hansel ; Hwang and Foote, 2005). To overcome these hurdles, different methods have been developed for increasing the mAbs ‘degree of humanness’ (Abhinandan and Martin, 2007) by replacing parts of the original non-human antibody with the corresponding human counterparts. This process is generally referred as ‘humanization’ and takes advantage of the particular architecture of the antibody molecule (Almagro and Fransson, 2008; Padlan, 1994). The molecules generated by such humanization procedures may partially or completely lose affinity for their intended antigen; this can be usually restored by re-introducing specific and case-dependent native residues in the humanized molecule through an experimental trial-and-error procedure going under the name of ‘back-mutation’ phase. Taking advantage of our experience in antibody sequence and structure analysis (Chailyan ; Ghiotto ; Marcatili ), we developed Tools for AntiBody Humanization (Tabhu), a comprehensive platform meant to help antibody humanization experiments. Tabhu integrates different methods to guide researchers through several steps of the humanization cycle, from the selection of a suitable human acceptor molecule to the evaluation of the back-mutations effect.

2 DESCRIPTION

The initial input page of Tabhu requires the sequence of the light and heavy chain variable domains (VL and VH, respectively; Padlan, 1994) of the xenogeneic antibody to be humanized (native Ab) and the antigen volume since the latter can be used to improve the prediction of the residues involved in antigen recognition (Olimpieri ). Tabhu uses two alternative sources of human sequences to choose the framework donor with the highest sequence similarity to the xenogeneic V region: a database consisting of both light and heavy chain sequences retrieved from the Digit database (Chailyan ) or human germline gene sequences compiled by IMGT (Giudicelli ) from which the user can select the Variable and Joining genes, that are eventually assembled together with the mouse complementarity determining regions (CDRs) to form the initial acceptor molecule. Tabhu lists the possible templates and shows relevant information for each of them. Once a receiving framework has been selected, the server starts an antibody humanization procedure that resembles what is usually done experimentally and involves four steps: (i) loop grafting, (ii) estimate of the binding mode similarity between the native and human antibody, (iii) back-mutations and (iv) re-evaluation of the binding mode similarity between input and humanized antibody (Supplementary Material, Supplementary Figure S1). The first step consists of grafting the xenogeneic CDRs into the human framework. The evaluation of the expected similarity of the binding mode is based on the proABC method that we have previously developed (Olimpieri ), that predicts the probability that every single antibody residue is involved in antigen recognition taking into account the entire sequence of the variable domains. If the pattern of interaction is very different between the input and humanized sequence, it can be expected that the resulting binding mode, and most likely the affinity, will be different. More details on the formula used to evaluate individual back-mutation importance are reported as Supplementary Material. Once the user selects which residues to back-mutate and submits them to the system, a new variant is generated and the process can be repeated. However, the introduction of mutations in the human antibody can lead to structural problems, such as the appearance of clashes or cavities in the modelled humanized antibody. Taking advantage of our antibody structure prediction tools (Chailyan ; Marcatili ), upon user request, Tabhu builds the three-dimensional models of the mouse and humanized antibodies, runs the procheck and EDTSurf tools (Laskowski ; Xu and Zhang, 2009) and alerts the user if the introduction of a back-mutation generates clashes or cavities, that the user can ignore or use as a guide to remove or introduce additional back-mutations. When the desired binding mode similarity between the xenogeneic and humanized antibody has been achieved the user can finalize the model and retrieve the three-dimensional model of the parental antibody, the amino acid sequence of the selected human template, the contact probabilities of the humanized antibody, the amino acid sequence of the final redesigned antibody and a back-translated nucleotide sequence optimized for being expressed in a number of organisms. Supplementary Material, Supplementary File S1 reports an example of antibody humanization with Tabhu.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Humanization of antibodies.

Authors:  Juan C Almagro; Johan Fransson
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Analyzing the "degree of humanness" of antibody sequences.

Authors:  K R Abhinandan; Andrew C R Martin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Therapeutic antibodies: successes, limitations and hopes for the future.

Authors:  Patrick Chames; Marc Van Regenmortel; Etienne Weiss; Daniel Baty
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  PIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structures.

Authors:  Paolo Marcatili; Alessandra Rosi; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Anatomy of the antibody molecule.

Authors:  E A Padlan
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 6.  Immunogenicity of engineered antibodies.

Authors:  William Ying Khee Hwang; Jefferson Foote
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 7.  The safety and side effects of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Trevor T Hansel; Harald Kropshofer; Thomas Singer; Jane A Mitchell; Andrew J T George
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Prediction of site-specific interactions in antibody-antigen complexes: the proABC method and server.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Olimpieri; Anna Chailyan; Anna Tramontano; Paolo Marcatili
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  IMGT/GENE-DB: a comprehensive database for human and mouse immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes.

Authors:  Véronique Giudicelli; Denys Chaume; Marie-Paule Lefranc
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Generating triangulated macromolecular surfaces by Euclidean Distance Transform.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  VH-VL orientation prediction for antibody humanization candidate selection: A case study.

Authors:  Alexander Bujotzek; Florian Lipsmeier; Seth F Harris; Jörg Benz; Andreas Kuglstatter; Guy Georges
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Antibody humanization by structure-based computational protein design.

Authors:  Yoonjoo Choi; Casey Hua; Charles L Sentman; Margaret E Ackerman; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  AbRSA: A robust tool for antibody numbering.

Authors:  Lei Li; Shuang Chen; Zhichao Miao; Yang Liu; Xu Liu; Zhi-Xiong Xiao; Yang Cao
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Design and engineering of deimmunized biotherapeutics.

Authors:  Karl E Griswold; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Redesigning an antibody H3 loop by virtual screening of a small library of human germline-derived sequences.

Authors:  Christopher R Corbeil; Mahder Seifu Manenda; Traian Sulea; Jason Baardsnes; Marie-Ève Picard; Hervé Hogues; Francis Gaudreault; Christophe Deprez; Rong Shi; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Identifying the Epitope Regions of Therapeutic Antibodies Based on Structure Descriptors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Brief introduction of current technologies in isolation of broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibodies.

Authors:  Zehua Sun; Lixin Yan; Jiansong Tang; Qian Qian; Jerica Lenberg; Dandan Zhu; Wan Liu; Kao Wu; Yilin Wang; Shiqiang Lu
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.303

Review 8.  Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases.

Authors:  Ruei-Min Lu; Yu-Chyi Hwang; I-Ju Liu; Chi-Chiu Lee; Han-Zen Tsai; Hsin-Jung Li; Han-Chung Wu
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 8.410

9.  Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends.

Authors:  Richard A Norman; Francesco Ambrosetti; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Lucy J Colwell; Sebastian Kelm; Sandeep Kumar; Konrad Krawczyk
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire data.

Authors:  Claire Marks; Alissa M Hummer; Mark Chin; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.