Literature DB >> 25304247

FISH for 22q11.2 deletion not cost-effective for infants with congenital heart disease with microarray.

Gabrielle C Geddes1, Mark Butterly, Imran Sajan.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the yield of genetic testing in infants with congenital heart disease, who undergo surgical intervention prior to one year of age, and develop a cost-effective strategy to screen infants with congenital heart disease for genetic conditions while providing standard of care. 409 charts of patients with congenital heart disease, who underwent surgical intervention prior to one year of age, were retrospectively reviewed for cytogenetic testing results. 278 patients underwent cytogenetic testing, and 89.6 % of these patients had more than one cytogenetic test completed. The most commonly encountered chromosomal anomaly within the sample was Down Syndrome (12.5 %), followed by 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (4.6 %). G-Banded Karyotypes were abnormal in 10.5 % of patients, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe for 22q11.2 deletion was abnormal in 7.1 % of patients. SNP microarray testing showed the highest yield and was abnormal in 33 % of patients. Based on the data at our institution, a more directed approach of genetic screening with only microarray would have saved our institution approximately $101, 200 on the 103 patients who underwent genetic evaluation with microarray reviewed. Screening infants with congenital heart disease for 22q11.2 deletion with FISH resulted in a loss of approximately $32,000 per 100 patients at our institution. Institutions should develop microarray-based protocols for genetic screening in patients with congenital heart disease with the anticipation of adding lesion-specific single gene testing as single gene testing becomes routinely available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25304247     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-014-1045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  7 in total

1.  Critical congenital heart disease--utility of routine screening for chromosomal and other extracardiac malformations.

Authors:  Kimberly Baker; Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo; Ricardo Munoz; Richard Orr; Shareen Kiray; Dana Shiderly; Michele Clemens; Peter Wearden; Victor O Morell; Constantinos Chrysostomou
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  New Genetic Insights into Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Stephanie M Ware; John Lynn Jefferies
Journal:  J Clin Exp Cardiolog       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 3.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genetics of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Ashleigh A Richards; Vidu Garg
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2010-05

5.  Genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects: high detection rates by using chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Yan Lu; Mai T Phung; Chad A Shaw; Kim Pham; Sarah E Neil; Ankita Patel; Trilochan Sahoo; Carlos A Bacino; Pawel Stankiewicz; Sung-Hae Lee Kang; Seema Lalani; A Craig Chinault; James R Lupski; Sau W Cheung; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Genetic testing practices in infants with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jessica A Connor; Robert B Hinton; Erin M Miller; Kristen L Sund; Jennifer G Ruschman; Stephanie M Ware
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Melanie Manning; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.822

  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Genetics and Genomics of Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Samir Zaidi; Martina Brueckner
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Laboratory Diagnosis and TBX1 and FGF8 Mutation Screening.

Authors:  Ilária C Sgardioli; Társis P Vieira; Milena Simioni; Fabíola P Monteiro; Vera L Gil-da-Silva-Lopes
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2015-03

3.  Testing criteria for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: preliminary results of a low cost strategy for public health.

Authors:  Ilária Cristina Sgardioli; Fabíola Paoli Monteiro; Paulo Fanti; Társis Paiva Vieira; Vera Lúcia Gil-da-Silva-Lopes
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 4.  Genetic testing for men with infertility: techniques and indications.

Authors:  Daniel L Pelzman; Kathleen Hwang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-03

5.  Genetic Testing Protocol Reduces Costs and Increases Rate of Genetic Diagnosis in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Geddes; Donald Basel; Peter Frommelt; Aaron Kinney; Michael Earing
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Rationale for the Cytogenomics of Cardiovascular Malformations Consortium: A Phenotype Intensive Registry Based Approach.

Authors:  Robert B Hinton; Kim L McBride; Steven B Bleyl; Neil E Bowles; William L Border; Vidu Garg; Teresa A Smolarek; Seema R Lalani; Stephanie M Ware
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2015-04-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.