Literature DB >> 23782710

Genetic testing practices in infants with congenital heart disease.

Jessica A Connor1, Robert B Hinton, Erin M Miller, Kristen L Sund, Jennifer G Ruschman, Stephanie M Ware.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical genetic testing is expanding rapidly, but the application of new testing has not been reported in an unselected, comprehensive congenital heart disease (CHD) patient population. This study aims to identify cytogenetic testing practices and diagnostic yield in infants with CHD as an important first step toward understanding clinical utility of dedicated cytogenetic testing. We hypothesized that chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) would identify genetic abnormalities underlying both syndromic and isolated CHD.
DESIGN: This is a single institution retrospective study that characterizes cytogenetic testing practices and diagnostic yield for all cytogenetic testing in each infant identified with CHD over a 32-month period. CHD was classified by type, complexity, and presence or absence of extracardiac anomalies.
RESULTS: Among the 1087 infants identified with CHD by echocardiogram, 277 infants (25%) had some form of cytogenetic testing, including karyotype, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and/or CMA. Forty-one percent of infants who had cytogenetic testing had more than one test. CMA was performed in 121 patients (11%), and abnormalities (both clinically significant and variants of unknown significance) were identified in 35/121 (29%). Forty-nine percent of CMA abnormalities were in patients with apparently isolated nonsyndromic CHD.
CONCLUSIONS: This single institution study identified that only 25% of infants with CHD underwent cytogenetic testing, indicating possible underutilization of testing in this age group. The high multiple testing rate indicates a need for improved guidelines for cost effective testing approaches. The diagnostic yield in this study suggests that CMA is a particularly useful first screening test when a specific syndrome is not clinically identifiable. Larger studies investigating cardiac lesion-specific diagnostic yield in isolated CHD are warranted.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular Malformation; Chromosome Microarray; Cytogenetic Testing; Genetic Syndrome; Infant

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23782710     DOI: 10.1111/chd.12112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis        ISSN: 1747-079X            Impact factor:   2.007


  19 in total

Review 1.  Genetic Basis for Congenital Heart Disease: Revisited: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mary Ella Pierpont; Martina Brueckner; Wendy K Chung; Vidu Garg; Ronald V Lacro; Amy L McGuire; Seema Mital; James R Priest; William T Pu; Amy Roberts; Stephanie M Ware; Bruce D Gelb; Mark W Russell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Genetic knowledge and attitudes of parents of children with congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt; Jennifer Klima; Kelly Kelleher; Deena Chisolm; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Variation in the clinical and genetic evaluation of undervirilized boys with bifid scrotum and hypospadias.

Authors:  J M Swartz; R Ciarlo; E Denhoff; A Abrha; D A Diamond; J N Hirschhorn; Y-M Chan
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  Utility of chromosomal microarray in anomalous fetuses.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Parchem; Teresa N Sparks; Kristen Gosnell; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 5.  Appropriate Use of Genetic Testing in Congenital Heart Disease Patients.

Authors:  Seiji Ito; Kimberly A Chapman; Monisha Kisling; Anitha S John
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Current Practice and Utility of Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Infants Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Jason R Buckley; Minoo N Kavarana; Shahryar M Chowdhury; Mark A Scheurer
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  FISH for 22q11.2 deletion not cost-effective for infants with congenital heart disease with microarray.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Geddes; Mark Butterly; Imran Sajan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Prevalence of Noncardiac and Genetic Abnormalities in Neonates Undergoing Cardiac Operations: Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.

Authors:  Angira Patel; John M Costello; Carl L Backer; Sara K Pasquali; Kevin D Hill; Amelia S Wallace; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Assessment of large copy number variants in patients with apparently isolated congenital left-sided cardiac lesions reveals clinically relevant genomic events.

Authors:  Neil A Hanchard; Luis A Umana; Lisa D'Alessandro; Mahshid Azamian; Mojisola Poopola; Shaine A Morris; Susan Fernbach; Seema R Lalani; Jeffrey A Towbin; Gloria A Zender; Sara Fitzgerald-Butt; Vidu Garg; Jessica Bowman; Gladys Zapata; Patricia Hernandez; Cammon B Arrington; Dieter Furthner; Siddharth K Prakash; Neil E Bowles; Kim L McBride; John W Belmont
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Genetic and environmental factors contributing to cardiovascular malformation: a unified approach to risk.

Authors:  Robert B Hinton
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.