Literature DB >> 25304168

Carbon mitigation, patient choice and cost reduction--triple bottom line optimisation for health care planning.

B Duane1, T Taylor2, W Stahl-Timmins2, J Hyland3, P Mackie4, A Pollard2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Health services must provide safe, affordable clinical care whilst meeting efficiency, environmental and social targets. These targets include achieving reduced greenhouse gas emissions. A care pathway approach based on a decision-support tool can simultaneously reconfigure health services, improve productivity and reduce carbon emissions. STUDY
DESIGN: Probabilistic modelling using secondary data analysis.
METHODS: Estimates of carbon emitted by a health service drew on a previous carbon accounting study which integrated bottom-up assessment of carbon emissions with top-down analysis of indirect emissions by Duane et al. (2012).(1) Using human resource information, estimates were applied in a decision-support model to measure the carbon footprint and service provision of theoretical scenarios. Using this model, sites with less than 60% utilisation were theoretically reconfigured to reduce carbon emissions and improve service provision.
RESULTS: Clinic utilisation rates improved from 50% to 78%. Human resource savings were identified which could be re-directed towards improving patient care. Patient travel for health care was halved resulting in significant savings in carbon emissions.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model is an effective health care service analysis tool, ensuring optimal utilisation of health care sites and human resources with the lowest carbon footprint.
Copyright © 2014 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon; Greenhouse gases; Service management; Service redesign; Sustainability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25304168     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  3 in total

1.  An estimated carbon footprint of NHS primary dental care within England. How can dentistry be more environmentally sustainable?

Authors:  B Duane; M Berners Lee; S White; R Stancliffe; I Steinbach
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Environmental sustainability in endodontics. A life cycle assessment (LCA) of a root canal treatment procedure.

Authors:  Brett Duane; Linnea Borglin; Stephanie Pekarski; Sophie Saget; Henry Fergus Duncan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 3.  Health, financial and environmental impacts of unnecessary vitamin D testing: a triple bottom line assessment adapted for healthcare.

Authors:  Matilde Breth-Petersen; Katy Bell; Kristen Pickles; Forbes McGain; Scott McAlister; Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.006

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.