Literature DB >> 25303907

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of small solid pancreatic lesions using a 22-gauge needle with side fenestration.

Carlo Fabbri1, Carmelo Luigiano, Antonella Maimone, Ilaria Tarantino, Paola Baccarini, Adele Fornelli, Rosa Liotta, Annamaria Polifemo, Luca Barresi, Mario Traina, Clara Virgilio, Vincenzo Cennamo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early detection of small pancreatic cancer is important because expected survival is markedly better for tumors ≤ 2 cm. A new endoscopic ultrasound-(EUS) guided biopsy needle with side fenestration has been recently developed to enable fine-needle biopsy (FNB) under EUS guidance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of EUS-FNB using a 22-gauge ProCore needle in solid pancreatic lesions ≤ 2 cm, in terms of diagnostic accuracy and yield.
METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2012, all consecutive EUS-guided tissue sampling of small pancreatic lesions (≤ 2 cm) were performed using 22-gauge ProCore needles; the data of these patients were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients with a mean age of 65.7 years were included. The mean lesion size was 16.5 mm (range 5-20). None of the patients developed complications. On pathological examination, the tissue retrieved was judged adequate in 58 out of 68 cases (85.3 %) and the presence of a tissue core was recorded in 36 out of 68 cases (52.9 %). The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 80, 100, 100, 40, and 82 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that EUS-FNB of small pancreatic lesions using a 22-gauge ProCore needle is effective and safe, and supports our hypothesis that EUS-FNB is highly useful in establishing the nature of small pancreatic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25303907     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3846-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  A multicenter U.S. experience with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration using the Olympus GF-UM30P echoendoscope: safety and effectiveness.

Authors:  A V Sahai; D Schembre; P D Stevens; A Chak; G Isenberg; C J Lightdale; M V Sivak; R H Hawes
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jiong Chen; Renbao Yang; Yin Lu; Yunlian Xia; Hangcheng Zhou
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Jan-Werner Poley; Alberto Larghi; Marc Giovannini; Maria Chiara Petrone; Ihab Abdulkader; Genevieve Monges; Guido Costamagna; Paolo Arcidiacono; Katharina Biermann; Guido Rindi; Erwan Bories; Claudio Dogloni; Marco Bruno; J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Takuji Iwashita; Yousuke Nakai; Jason B Samarasena; Do Hyun Park; Zesong Zhang; Mai Gu; John G Lee; Kenneth J Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic carcinoma: a 3-year experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Lourdes R Ylagan; Steven Edmundowicz; Kay Kasal; Douglas Walsh; Danielle W Lu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-12-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Pancreatic cancer: the bigger picture.

Authors:  A M Cooperman
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.

Authors:  Shin Haba; Kenji Yamao; Vikram Bhatia; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kazuo Hara; Susumu Hijioka; Hiroshi Imaoka; Yasumasa Niwa; Masahiro Tajika; Shinya Kondo; Tsutomu Tanaka; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Yasushi Yatabe; Waki Hosoda; Hiroshi Kawakami; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alberto Larghi; Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Jan-Werner Poley; Geneviève Monges; Maria Chiara Petrone; Guido Rindi; Ihab Abdulkader; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Guido Costamagna; Katharina Biermann; Erwan Bories; Claudio Doglioni; J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz; Cesare Hassan; Marco Bruno; Marc Giovannini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Benedict Devereaux; Melissa Chriswell; Kathleen McGreevy; Thomas Howard; Thomas F Imperiale; Donato Ciaccia; Kathleen A Lane; Dean Maglinte; Kenyon Kopecky; Julia LeBlanc; Lee McHenry; James Madura; Alex Aisen; Harvey Cramer; Oscar Cummings; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Factors predictive of adverse events associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions.

Authors:  Akio Katanuma; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Kei Yane; Shunpei Hashigo; Toshihumi Kin; Maki Kaneko; Shin Kato; Ryusuke Kato; Ryo Harada; Manabu Osanai; Kuniyuki Takahashi; Masanori Nojima
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  17 in total

1.  Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Elia Armellini; Erminia Manfrin; Elena Trisolini; Silvano Andorno; Marco Ballarè; Laura Bernardoni; Renzo Luciano Boldorini; Armando Gabbrielli; Luca Frulloni; Alberto Larghi; Pietro Occhipinti; Aldo Scarpa; Stefano Francesco Crinò
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

3.  The presence of rapid on-site evaluation did not increase the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions with core needle.

Authors:  Carlo Fabbri; Lorenzo Fuccio; Adele Fornelli; Filippo Antonini; Rosa Liotta; Leonardo Frazzoni; Alberto Larghi; Antonella Maimone; Silvia Paggi; Paolo Gusella; Luca Barresi; Anna Maria Polifemo; Elio Iovine; Giampiero Macarri; Vincenzo Cennamo; Ilaria Tarantino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle core biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignant lesions: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yongtao Yang; Lianyong Li; Changmin Qu; Shuwen Liang; Bolun Zeng; Zhiwen Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Diagnostic accuracy of 22/25-gauge core needle in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyoung-Chul Oh; Hyun Kang; Jae Young Lee; Geun Joo Choi; Jung Sik Choi
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.884

6.  22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses.

Authors:  William Sterlacci; Athanasios D Sioulas; Lothar Veits; Pervin Gönüllü; Guido Schachschal; Stefan Groth; Mario Anders; Christos K Kontos; Theodoros Topalidis; Andrea Hinsch; Michael Vieth; Thomas Rösch; Ulrike W Denzer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jinlin Wang; Xiaoli Wu; Ping Yin; Qiaozhen Guo; Wei Hou; Yawen Li; Yun Wang; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  An experimental study to assess the best maneuver when using a reverse side-bevel histology needle for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.

Authors:  Akane Yamabe; Atsushi Irisawa; Goro Shibukawa; Koki Hoshi; Mariko Fujisawa; Ryo Igarashi; Yoko Abe; Koh Imbe
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-11-27

9.  Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Qian Chen; Jinlin Wang; Xiaoli Wu; Yaqi Duan; Ping Yin; Qiaozhen Guo; Wei Hou; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Rare metastatic pancreatic tumors from lung cancer with cystic changes resembling intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: a case report.

Authors:  Akira Watanabe; Norifumi Harimoto; Takahiro Yamanaka; Norihiro Ishii; Mariko Tsukagoshi; Takamichi Igarashi; Norio Kubo; Kenichiro Araki; Aya Suzuki; Kenichiro Hara; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.