Literature DB >> 25303062

Reassurance as a key outcome valued by emergency ambulance service users: a qualitative interview study.

Fiona J Togher1, Alicia O'Cathain2, Viet-Hai Phung1, Janette Turner2, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing need to assess the performance of emergency ambulance services using measures other than the time taken for an ambulance to arrive on scene. In line with government policy, patients and carers can help to shape new measures of ambulance service performance.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the aspects of emergency ambulance service care valued by users.
DESIGN: Qualitative interview study.
SETTING: One of 11 ambulance services in England. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two users and eight of their spouses (n = 30).
RESULTS: Users of the emergency ambulance service, experiencing different types of ambulance service response, valued similar aspects of their pre-hospital care. Users were often extremely anxious about their health, and the outcome they valued was reassurance provided by ambulance service staff that they were receiving appropriate advice, treatment and care. This sense of being reassured was enhanced by the professional behaviour of staff, which instilled confidence in their care; communication; a short wait for help; and continuity during transfers. A timely response was valued in terms of allaying anxiety quickly. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the emergency ambulance service to allay the high levels of fear and anxiety felt by users is crucial to the delivery of a high quality service. Measures developed to assess and monitor the performance of emergency ambulance services should include the proportion of users reporting feeling reassured by the response they obtained.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; emergency medical services; patient experience; patient satisfaction; prehospital care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25303062      PMCID: PMC5810705          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  11 in total

1.  How helpful is NHS direct? Postal survey of callers.

Authors:  A O'Cathain; J F Munro; J P Nicholl; E Knowles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-15

2.  The acceptability of an emergency medical dispatch system to people who call 999 to request an ambulance.

Authors:  A O'Cathain; J Turner; J P Nicholl
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  The critical incident technique.

Authors:  J C FLANAGAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Proposed changes for nurse education in England (UK) as a result of the Darzi report (DoH, 2008a) Health Quality Care for All--NHS next stage review final report: some initial observations.

Authors:  Karen Holland
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.281

5.  Potentially avoidable emergency department attendance: interview study of patients' reasons for attendance.

Authors:  S Agarwal; J Banerjee; R Baker; S Conroy; R Hsu; A Rashid; J Camosso-Stefinovic; P Sinfield; M Habiba
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Effect of reducing ambulance response times on deaths from out of hospital cardiac arrest: cohort study.

Authors:  J P Pell; J M Sirel; A K Marsden; I Ford; S M Cobbe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-09

7.  The experience of reassurance: patients' perspectives.

Authors:  A Fareed
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Patients' and emergency clinicians' perceptions of improving pre-hospital pain management: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Mohammad Iqbal; Peggy Anne Spaight; A Niroshan Siriwardena
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  More than medical treatment: the patient's first encounter with prehospital emergency care.

Authors:  Carina Elmqvist; Bengt Fridlund; Margaretha Ekebergh
Journal:  Int Emerg Nurs       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.142

10.  Patients who call emergency ambulances for primary care problems: a qualitative study of the decision-making process.

Authors:  Matthew J Booker; Rosemary L Simmonds; Sarah Purdy
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Why do patients with 'primary care sensitive' problems access ambulance services? A systematic mapping review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthew J Booker; Ali R G Shaw; Sarah Purdy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne E Coster; Janette K Turner; Daniel Bradbury; Anna Cantrell
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Prioritizing novel and existing ambulance performance measures through expert and lay consensus: A three-stage multimethod consensus study.

Authors:  Joanne E Coster; Andy D Irving; Janette K Turner; Viet-Hai Phung; Aloysius N Siriwardena
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Patient Satisfaction with Pre-Hospital Emergency Services. A Qualitative Study Comparing Professionals' and Patients' Views.

Authors:  Fernando García-Alfranca; Anna Puig; Carles Galup; Hortensia Aguado; Ismael Cerdá; Mercedes Guilabert; Virtudes Pérez-Jover; Irene Carrillo; José Joaquín Mira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Perceptions and experiences of community first responders on their role and relationships: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Viet-Hai Phung; Ian Trueman; Fiona Togher; Roderick Ørner; Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Exploring variation in how ambulance services address non-conveyance: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Emma Knowles; Lindsey Bishop-Edwards; Alicia O'Cathain
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Seeking ambulance treatment for 'primary care' problems: a qualitative systematic review of patient, carer and professional perspectives.

Authors:  Matthew J Booker; Sarah Purdy; Alison R G Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Factors associated with inappropriate use of emergency departments: findings from a cross-sectional national study in France.

Authors:  Diane Naouri; Guillaume Ranchon; Albert Vuagnat; Jeannot Schmidt; Carlos El Khoury; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Patient experience of centralized acute stroke care pathways.

Authors:  Catherine Perry; Iliatha Papachristou; Angus I G Ramsay; Ruth J Boaden; Christopher McKevitt; Simon J Turner; Charles D A Wolfe; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Why do ambulance services have different non-transport rates? A national cross sectional study.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Richard Jacques; Tony Stone; Janette Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.