Literature DB >> 11904272

The acceptability of an emergency medical dispatch system to people who call 999 to request an ambulance.

A O'Cathain1, J Turner, J P Nicholl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptability of an emergency medical dispatch (EMD) system to people who call 999 to request an ambulance.
METHODS: Postal questionnaires to two systematic random samples of approximately 500 named callers to one ambulance service before, and one year after, the introduction of EMD.
RESULTS: The response rate was 72% (355 of 493) before, and 63% (297 of 466) after, EMD. There was a reduction, from 81% (284 of 349) to 70% (200 of 286), in the proportion of callers who found all the questions asked by the call taker relevant, although this did not adversely affect the proportion of callers who were very satisfied with the 999 call, which increased from 78% (268 of 345) to 86% (247 of 287). The proportion of callers who reported receiving first aid advice increased from 7% (23 of 323) to 43% (117 of 272) and general information from 13% (41 of 315) to 58% (157 of 269). Satisfaction levels with the amount of advice given increased, while satisfaction with response times remained stable at 76% (254 of 320) very satisfied before and 78% (217 of 279) after EMD. The proportion of respondents very satisfied with the service in general increased from 71% (238 of 336) to 79% (220 of 277). There was evidence in respondents' written comments of two potential problems with EMD from the caller's viewpoint. Firstly, some callers were advised to take actions that were subsequently not needed; secondly, a small number of callers felt that the ambulance crew did not treat the situation as seriously as they would have liked.
CONCLUSIONS: Introducing EMD increases the amount of first aid and general advice given to callers, and satisfaction with these aspects of the service, while maintaining satisfaction with response times. Overall satisfaction with the service increased. However, some changes may be needed to prevent a small amount of dissatisfaction directly associated with EMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11904272      PMCID: PMC1725824          DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.2.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

Review 1.  Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances.

Authors:  H Snooks; H Wrigley; S George; E Thomas; H Smith; A Glasper
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-07

2.  Dispatcher-assisted telephone CPR: common delays and time standards for delivery.

Authors:  L L Culley; J J Clark; M S Eisenberg; M P Larsen
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why?

Authors:  F F Palazzo; O J Warner; M Harron; A Sadana
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-11
  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Patients' experiences of care provided by emergency care practitioners and traditional ambulance practitioners: a survey from the London Ambulance Service.

Authors:  M Halter; T Marlow; C Tye; G T H Ellison
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  "Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires - a bane or a bonus to research?

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Kate J Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  Patient Satisfaction with Pre-Hospital Emergency Services. A Qualitative Study Comparing Professionals' and Patients' Views.

Authors:  Fernando García-Alfranca; Anna Puig; Carles Galup; Hortensia Aguado; Ismael Cerdá; Mercedes Guilabert; Virtudes Pérez-Jover; Irene Carrillo; José Joaquín Mira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Mobile Ambulatory Application Asafny and Traditional Phone Request 997: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Arwa Althumairi; Zainab Alnasser; Sarah Alsadeq; Nouf Al-Kahtani; Afnan Aljaffary
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-05

5.  Reassurance as a key outcome valued by emergency ambulance service users: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Fiona J Togher; Alicia O'Cathain; Viet-Hai Phung; Janette Turner; Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.377

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.