Literature DB >> 25302607

Is prostate cancer changing?: evolving patterns of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Stephanie M Doctor1, Che-Kai Tsao, James H Godbold, Matthew D Galsky, William K Oh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) most commonly metastasizes to the bone, and less commonly to nonosseous sites (eg, lymph nodes, liver, lung). With new therapies extending survival in mCRPC, it was hypothesized that the pattern of metastases is changing over time. The pattern of metastatic disease was evaluated in men with mCRPC, as reported in baseline characteristics of prospective clinical trials over 2 decades.
METHODS: This study identified all phase 2 and 3 therapeutic studies in men with mCRPC in PubMed and American Society of Clinical Oncology abstracts from 1990 to 2012. Studies were excluded if they did not report demographic data and sites of metastasis, or excluded patients with a specific site of metastatic disease (except brain). For each type of metastasis, weighted least squares linear regression models were used to evaluate temporal trends.
RESULTS: A total of 290 eligible studies (270 phase 2 studies and 20 phase 3 studies) involving 19,110 patients were identified. Between 1990 and 2012, the rate of nonosseous metastasis increased significantly at 1.6% per year (P < .0001), whereas the rate of osseous metastasis decreased at 0.5% per year (P < .0001). The rate of lymph node metastasis increased at 1.4% per year (P < .0001), but the rate of liver and lung metastasis remained relatively stable.
CONCLUSIONS: A notable change was found in the pattern of metastasis in patients with mCRPC. Because these evolving patterns may have important implications in treatment selection and prognosis, it is crucial that future clinical trials of patients with mCRPC define patients with a uniform reporting of nonosseous metastasis.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; castration-resistant prostate cancer; liver; lung; lymph node; metastasis; patterns; visceral

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25302607     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

Review 1.  Malignant invasion of the central nervous system: the hidden face of a poorly understood outcome of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eliane Gouvêa de Oliveira Barros; Nathalia Meireles Da Costa; Celia Yelimar Palmero; Luis Felipe Ribeiro Pinto; Luiz Eurico Nasciutti; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases: toward the best therapeutic choice.

Authors:  Giandomenico Roviello; Martina Catalano; Carlotta Ottanelli; Roberta Giorgione; Virginia Rossi; Elisabetta Gambale; Chiara Casadei; Ugo De Giorgi; Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Diagnostic imaging to detect and evaluate response to therapy in bone metastases from prostate cancer: current modalities and new horizons.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Francesco Bertoldo; Francesco Boccardo; Giario Conti; Ilario Menchi; Francesco Mungai; Umberto Ricardi; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Prognostic factors for overall survival in prostate cancer patients with different site-specific visceral metastases: A study of 1358 patients.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Cui; Xiao-Feng Cong; Feng Gao; Jia-Xin Yin; Zi-Ru Niu; Song-Chen Zhao; Zi-Ling Liu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Androgen Receptor Pathway-Independent Prostate Cancer Is Sustained through FGF Signaling.

Authors:  Eric G Bluemn; Ilsa M Coleman; Jared M Lucas; Roger T Coleman; Susana Hernandez-Lopez; Robin Tharakan; Daniella Bianchi-Frias; Ruth F Dumpit; Arja Kaipainen; Alexandra N Corella; Yu Chi Yang; Michael D Nyquist; Elahe Mostaghel; Andrew C Hsieh; Xiaotun Zhang; Eva Corey; Lisha G Brown; Holly M Nguyen; Kenneth Pienta; Michael Ittmann; Michael Schweizer; Lawrence D True; David Wise; Paul S Rennie; Robert L Vessella; Colm Morrissey; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  A Fusion Transcription Factor-Driven Cancer Progresses to a Fusion-Independent Relapse via Constitutive Activation of a Downstream Transcriptional Target.

Authors:  Salah Boudjadi; Puspa Raj Pandey; Bishwanath Chatterjee; Thanh Hung Nguyen; Wenyue Sun; Frederic G Barr
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 13.312

Review 7.  The prevention of fragility fractures in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer: a position statement by the international osteoporosis foundation.

Authors:  Luisella Cianferotti; Francesco Bertoldo; Marco Carini; John A Kanis; Alberto Lapini; Nicola Longo; Giuseppe Martorana; Vincenzo Mirone; Jean-Yves Reginster; Rene Rizzoli; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-18

8.  Reliability and validity test of VES-13 and analysis of influencing factors for the vulnerable condition of patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jia Feng; Qian Sun; Jing Li; Ting-Ting Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Treatment with the WNT5A-mimicking peptide Foxy-5 effectively reduces the metastatic spread of WNT5A-low prostate cancer cells in an orthotopic mouse model.

Authors:  Giacomo Canesin; Susan Evans-Axelsson; Rebecka Hellsten; Agnieszka Krzyzanowska; Chandra P Prasad; Anders Bjartell; Tommy Andersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.