Literature DB >> 25302002

Relative object detectability (ROD): a new metric for comparing x-ray image detector performance for a specified object of interest.

V Singh1, A Jain1, D R Bednarek1, S Rudin1.   

Abstract

Relative object detectability (ROD) quantifies the relative performance of two image detectors for a specified object of interest by taking the following ratio: the integral of detective quantum efficiency of a detector weighted by the frequency spectrum of the object divided by that for a second detector. Four different detectors, namely the micro-angiographic fluoroscope (MAF), the Dexela Model 1207 (Dex) and Hamamatsu Model C10901D-40 (Ham) CMOS x-ray detectors, and a flat-panel detector (FPD) were compared. The ROD was calculated for six pairs of detectors: (1) Dex/FPD, (2) MAF/FPD, (3) Ham/FPD, (4) Dex/Ham, (5) MAF/Ham and (6) MAF/Dex for wires of 5 mm fixed length, solid spheres ranging in diameter from 50 to 600 microns, and four simulated iodine-filled blood vessels of outer diameters 0.4 and 0.5 mm, each with wall thicknesses of 0.1 and 0.15 mm. Marked variation of ROD for the wires and spheres is demonstrated as a function of object size for the various detector pairs. The ROD of all other detectors relative to the FPD was much greater than one for small features and approached 1.0 as the diameter increased. The relative detectability of simulated small iodine-filled blood vessels for all detector pairs was seen to be independent of the vessel wall thickness for the same inner diameter. In this study, the ROD is shown to have the potential to be a useful figure of merit to evaluate the relative performance of two detectors for a given imaging task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DQE; detectability; new metric; relative performance of detectors; specified imaging task

Year:  2014        PMID: 25302002      PMCID: PMC4188352          DOI: 10.1117/12.2043504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  4 in total

1.  Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.

Authors:  Iacovos S Kyprianou; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A theoretical and experimental evaluation of the microangiographic fluoroscope: A high-resolution region-of-interest x-ray imager.

Authors:  Amit Jain; D R Bednarek; Ciprian Ionita; S Rudin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. I. Experimental evaluation and feasibility.

Authors:  Arundhuti Ganguly; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Iacovos S Kyprianou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Detector system comparison using relative CNR for specific imaging tasks related to neuro-endovascular image-guided interventions (neuro-EIGIs).

Authors:  Brendan Loughran; S N Swetadri Vasan; Vivek Singh; Ciprian N Ionita; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-19
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative comparison using Generalized Relative Object Detectability (G-ROD) metrics of an amorphous selenium detector with high resolution Microangiographic Fluoroscopes (MAF) and standard flat panel detectors (FPD).

Authors:  M Russ; A Shankar; A Jain; S V Setlur Nagesh; C N Ionita; C Scott; K S Karim; D R Bednarek; S Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-22

2.  New Family of Generalized Metrics for Comparative Imaging System Evaluation.

Authors:  M Russ; V Singh; B Loughran; D R Bednarek; S Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-18

3.  Use of patient specific 3D printed neurovascular phantoms to evaluate the clinical utility of a high resolution x-ray imager.

Authors:  S V Setlur Nagesh; M Russ; C N Ionita; D Bednarek; S Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.